Well, I think we should be clear regarding the point in time when the “agreement” theory came about, it was when Harry & Megs were dating. I’ve actually written about it before in regards to someone before: https://houseofbrat.tumblr.com/post/172140441069/i-can-tell-you-harry-did-have-an-agreement-with
An “agreement” while they were dating, and Megs was touting the relationship left and right in the press is believable; an agreement regarding a royal engagement that uses taxpayer funds to prepare a wedding is not.
I completely disagree with you on them seeing Harry as innocent. I’ve seen #FreePrinceHarry and other references to Harry being a “victim” of Meghan. Can’t prove it at the minute because two of those blogs are (temporarily?) deleted.
Yes, they’re entitled to their point of view; however, I’m of the opinion that they have also strung people along to get them to believe that they have access to information regarding this “fake engagement/agreement.” They don’t.
Which do you think is more believable?
Option A: The British royal family decided to have Harry become engaged to Meghan so that he could break off the engagement and dump her more publicly because she blackmailed him into marriage.
Option B: Prince Philip at almost 97 years of age dies from post-surgery complications–possibly a pulmonary embolism–in mid-to-late April. Due to the mourning protocol, the wedding is postponed. The wedding is rescheduled for a date in the fall. Megs & Harry’s relationship burns out over the summer, and they break off the engagement and cancel the wedding.
