Also, Lainey is at it again course-correcting for Rachel. Have you noticed her constantly using the prefix “Royal” now anytime she mentions Rachel? I don’t see her doing that with any of the other actual Royals. I wonder though, how do Lainey and her Toronto based peers seriously address Rachel as HRH. I mean, this chic is basic AF for the rest of us.. imagine knowing her from back in the day? How do you reconcile that? 1/2

anonymoushouseplantfan:

2/2 – Do you listen to Lainey’s podcasts? Her co-podcast producer mentioned that they used to do a lot of fashion/entertainment/regional hotspot segments with local based celebrities. Apparently there is a LOT of b-roll sitting around Toronto with Rachel fake-lifestyle guruing. The producer mentioned she though Rachel was basic AF, and it was jarring to have one of their own (or someone even lower than them on the thirsty-social TO totem pole) in the BRF.


Thanks, I don’t listen to the podcast, so this is interesting.

Yup. It was on the “Sasha Answers” podcast after the wedding:

They discuss Megs and the wedding for the first 17 and a half minutes. Sasha openly says that Megs did NOT come across as completely genuine during the wedding. 

They also discuss Meg’s fashion disaster from her first outing as a royal.

I think Lainey actually even says during the podcast that she’s not sure she’s ever liked Meghan’s style. 

You know, things Lainey will say talking on a podcast that she won’t put in writing for her readers…

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.