Was it like that with Kate.. like was she this invisible after her marriage? Were all her appearances documented like crazy for days? It seems like with markle the press waits with baited breath for her next engagement and the days that shes not out its just endless articles on her nonsense.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Do you mean “visible” instead of “invisible”? Because Will and Kate were EVERYWHERE in 2011.

My recollection of the Cambridge’s first year is that they would disappear for weeks and then we’d get some ridiculously high-profile huge-press event like meeting the Obamas or touring the US or Kate having a solo gala. The DM has a summary of their first year.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2135065/Kate-Middleton-Prince-Williams-year-marriage-looked-on.html 

There was a ton of coverage of everything they did (including mundane stuff like shopping or talking walks), and they were credited with re-invigorating the monarchy.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/prince-william-kate-middleton-year-marriage-reinvigorated-fading-luster-royals-article-1.1065498

The Canada tour had so much coverage that even the reporter were complaining.

http://newsfeed.time.com/2011/07/05/royal-rivalry-prince-william-trounces-kate-in-canadian-dragon-boat-race/

I remember there was a lot of curiosity about their personal lives–honeymoon, house, shopping, Lupo, date nights, relationship with the Middletons, Kate’s shopping trips to London. Also, Kate’s fashion had a ton of coverage. The beige Reiss dress she wore to meet the Obamas, in particular, was a sensation.

Even their first anniversary dinner was a source of huge speculation.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2137129/Kate-Pippa-Middleton-attend-friends-big-day-year-royal-wedding.html

The main difference I see between the way the couples are/were covered by the press is that with Will and Kate there was HUGE interest in their interactions and private life. Everyone wanted to know what the cottage looked like, how they interacted with each other, what Kate was cooking, what the dog’s name was, etc… There was also a ton of interest in Kate’s clothes, organic interest and not just People mag trying to sell beach cover-ups.

With the Slutsexes, there’s more interest in how Meghan is handling the royal protocol than anything else. The “fish out of water” aspect of it is taking over. Will and Kate didn’t have that kind of coverage, mainly because Kate had been part of “The Windsor Show” for so long that her official intro was seamless. 

Looking back the Cambridge’s first year, what strikes me is how “fresh” their appearances were–with the Obamas at the palace, in the Canadian wilderness, playing polo in LA, playing with kids. They really looked like a young couple who were having fun and putting a new spin on what it meant to be royal. In contrast, Meghan in her off-color pantyhose and 80s Diana outfits is already looking like a Madame Tussaud’s wax figure. Actually, the official was figure looks younger than Meghan right now.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.