Fashion anon – she has little to attract them – she will wear something as a come on – see me and the coverage you could get if you pay me to wear it again. The articles in BBC WWD and WSJ about how much she can sell when she wears something are fishing expeditions for more sponsors. Her pr sends out emails to o push coverage so she gets lots of exposure which will attract the sponsors. Do a search for MM Givenchy and see how many places her pic shows up in. Pt 1

Pt 2 ultimately though she can’t maintain public interest – brands look at the numbers and hers suck. She cannot sustain interest especially without Harry. And she does not show clothes well. Too short can’t walk in stilettos and the makeup and mistakes generate too many negatives. Notice Prada did not feature her on their IG when she wore that Prada. She tries but she really is just a zlist celeb. Givenchy took her pic off their IG when she wore the wallpaper dress. But her reps keep try

This is what I got when I did the MM + Givenchy search:

Some are clearly referencing other previous Givenchy outings, but I totally agree with you. It’s really nice to hear someone confirm what others have been thinking. I’ve seen some of the same thinking over at @anonymoushouseplantfan. First Oscar de la Renta blocked comments on MM’s picture, and then they took down her picture completely. 

I suspect MM’s engagement on July 5th, and her engagements from July 9 through 11th are make-or-break for her on the fashion front. If she can’t look great, then I doubt she’s going to get anything else after. It’s becoming obvious to too many people that she’s a dud.

By the way, looks like Oscar de la Renta still has some anti-MM comments on that dress (with the model) photo. 

Guess since it’s no longer recent that they don’t care as much about it.

Thanks fashion anon!