Not surprised by her lack of interest in charity rollout. Remember that she didn’t get to where she is by being NICE! Think of women you know who married powerful or wealthy spouses. They fall into three camps: (1) Childhood / school / same circle sweethearts (2) Matched pairs (both professional, or equally rich / powerful, and (3) opportunistic (he wants sex, youth; she wants $. Her romantic history has always been #3, it takes a certain type of person to be like this.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

That’s a good point, but I was thinking more in terms of her promo, which she is very serious and practical about. It’s interesting that she’s focusing on Australia (OMG, I just realized that the dog is supposedly named Oz, LOLOLOLOL). Instead of building up a charitable credit.

On the other hand, it was depressing to see how little you actually had to do to get the “humanitarian” label, so it shouldn’t surprise me that she feels she can skimp on the charity stuff. She got people to call her a humanitarian with little effort, but she’s been unsuccessful in attaining the coveted “fashion icon” label, no matter how hard she tries.