I’m the anon who asked about the baby being IVF. You said that or surrogate. I wonder, though, about the law in the UK being that a surrogate is legally considered the mother and must sign rights over to the biological parents? Not sure where I saw that. Also, that to be considered rightfully in the line of succession, the child has to be born “of the body,” meaning Meghan has to actually give birth, not a surrogate? No sass meant – just curious if you have heard of that?

Uncategorized 1 Minute

anonymoushouseplantfan:

I’ve heard of those, but I don’t think Megs cares all that much for the legalities. She can get it done outside the UK and Harry’s pretty far down the line of succession. 

That being said, I’m in the minority about the surrogacy. The Talking Tarot blog, for example, is pretty sure it’s not surrogacy.

I’ll say it again. Surrogacy contracts are NOT legally enforceable in the UK.

And the kid needs to be born in the UK as part of the royal family.

Unknown's avatar

Published by House of Brat

Published

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.