T, dude, even Naomi Tarot is stumped by that damned “MM Secret™”. This chick is seedy and it is seeping through like everybody’s cards. Everybody. Nai thinks it’s probably to do with something involving fertility and past actions affecting her fertility or something and apparently Meg’s worried about Harry/RF finding out. Giiiiiirl… The drama of this gal…. (This is the short Naomi YT reading about it btw: TAROT WHAT IS MEGHAN MARKLE’S SECRET)

talkingtarot:

Lmao. That’s why when you guys ask for what her secrets about its hard to know for sure because looking for her secrets is like going in a pot and looking for one specific piece of gold, there’s so many of them it’s hard to pin down.

She wont leave without a kid no matter what. Plus why would she divorce him anyways? Shes got a title, palace, Charles credit card, helicopter rides whenever she wants, 24/7 security, ‘international’ publicity, so why would she leave? She would lose it all in the divorce. Her thirst for fame & being adored wont allow a divorce

image

MM is not meant to be a royal which is painful clear BUT I wouldn’t put it past Harry and Meg to try to”change the rules” on baby making for Royals lol so they could use a surrogate, use PR against “Royal Rules” on how it’s hard for a woman to have a child (which is true). Then another “War of the Traditions/protocol” will emerge making BRF the bad guy. Don’t underestimate this woman’s need to get what she wants even if she’s not maternal. Anon is right, she has nothing else. 👰+💎💷🛍👑👶=😍😈

The difference between having a surrogate carry her baby (because Megs can’t do it) and her merching & pr extravaganza is HUGE. Like, how would they hide it? Megs wouldn’t be pregnant and people would notice. Do you really think she would be able to gain that much weight to convince people she’s pregnant? She’s tiny. If she were truly pregnant, then it would be obvious. Then what are you going to do with the surrogate? Like, no one she knows would notice that she had a baby and doesn’t have it? Like, people wouldn’t possibly talk and then go to the tabloids? This would be a HUGE firestorm in the UK. 

The law looks pretty clear to me

image

Look at that last line there: “Surrogacy contracts aren’t enforced by UK law, even if you’ve signed a deal with your surrogate and have paid for her expenses.” It is NOT a legally enforceable contract. Surrogate is legally able to keep the kid if she wants.

NO WAY would Charles or the Queen give the okay for this to be done. What do you think would happen if the surrogate mother decided she wanted to keep the baby? SCANDAL!! And one that would get maximum visibility.

image

www navamsa com / ?p=3725 Check this reading out. Vedic reading for H & M. Interesting, no? (I removed the dots but if you copy paste it into google, you’ll get the link.

keepingupwiththebananadrama:

princeharryconfessions:

http://www.navamsa.com/?p=3725

ooooohhhhh interesting

7 years is 7 years too long imo ugh

@princeharryconfessions maybe its 7 months. Idk how this crap works, I’m just here for those tags.

Well, it’s nice to read a professional Vedic astrologer basically saying straight out that these two dunderheads are not compatible with each other for marriage. He applied multiple techniques, and they were not compatible with any of them.

Regarding the “seven-year-itch” technique, I think it’s important to remember that there are hundreds or thousands of techniques in Vedic astrology. So while that technique worked for Charles’ marriage, I’m not so sure it automatically works for Harry. 

I think it’s also important to take into account some of the transits that I mentioned previously here, which this guy did not do but Joni Patry (another Vedic & Western astrologer) did. Joni literally spent a minute or two politely talking about how Megs was and currently is delusional about her current marriage. Literally. It’s in that video I posted

I think it’s significant that Venus goes retrograde on October 5 less than 3 degrees away from Harry’s Saturn. Plus Harry begins his Rahu-Venus dasha on October 17, which is the sub-period of a debilitated planet, Venus in this case, that is the karaka (indicator) of marriage. Venus becomes combust the Sun in the sky astrologically a few days later, about October 21st; although, depending upon the degree range you give for Venus being combust the Sun, some people may consider it to happen earlier. Anyhow, when you can’t see a planet–in this case Venus–in the sky because it’s combust, it is said to affect the domains it represents such as love and marriage. Conveniently, Venus will be combust (”burning up”) while Harry & Megs are on their overseas tour. That’s not exactly favorable.

On top of that, we have Jupiter moving from Libra to Scorpio (sidereal zodiac) on October 11th. One, that’s Harry’s ascendant lord (Jupiter) in the 12th house. That is a change from a more social sign & house (Libra/11th/friends, increase, gains, & achievement) to a moksha house (”liberation from karmic bondage” but also often signifying any type of loss). Two, Scorpio is often known as the sign of hidden things, so we should expect Jupiter’s placement to shine a light on hidden things while it’s there. So any secrets of Meghan that will/could be exposed will likely happen after October 11th. If it happens to deal with her ability to have children, then this will make sense since Jupiter will be transiting her 5th house, which deals with children. 

Venus goes direct on November 16th, but then Mercury goes retrograde the very next day on the 17th. I always consider Mercury retrograde to be a stressful time for people in general, and this time it will be happening in Scorpio in Harry’s 12th and Meghan’s 5th houses. Could secrets be spilled at this time? Possibly. Mercury goes direct on December 6th, same day as the new moon. So probably stressful times until then. 

I still have yet to read or see an example of a professional astrologer commenting on how Megs fits into Harry’s birth chart, not navamsha (marriage) chart. I don’t think she’s really represented there. I still think if this marriage was going to last even seven years that she would be represented more significantly. I don’t think Megs fits his birth chart if you do read Harry’s chart from his 7th house but maybe that’s just me. 

But anyway, by Halloween, we’ll have an idea how this is going to go.

Besides tarot readings I for one think if shes not pregnant now, she will use a surrogate but I dont know how she will pull it off. I mean, this woman has nothing if she divorces PH w/out a kid. Literally. She has no job & not enough money to sustain herself w/ her expensive taste. A kid is what she needs to remain relevant & have lifelong publicity. Im still on the fence whether or not she’ll succeed at getting a kid though. No doubt she’s desperate to be pregnant already.

I don’t think Charles is going to shell out money for a surrogate. Harry is likely not going to pay for it since he depends on his father. The Queen isn’t going to approve of using a surrogate either. 

If she really did use a surrogate, then it would pose problems with how to hide it from the press. Because legally in the UK, Megs would not be the mother of the child. It would be a huge scandal for the monarchy if discovered. Charles and the Queen both know this, which is why Charles will never shell money out for it.

image

There was a blind back in April that she planned to get prego after the 1st 3-6 months then a 2nd kid within a year after that. I reckon she bit off more than she could chew, thought she’d get prego w/ a snap of her fingers, it didnt work & now shes looking at surrogacy. The rate shes going, I have to wonder if she will even have a kid. But why would she leave PH without a kid? Shes nothing & has nothing w/out him.

I personally don’t think she can bring a baby to term. Could she conceive with the help of some artificial reproductive technology such as IVF? Possibly. Bu I don’t think she would be able to maintain it. Just my opinion. I’m sure she will try for a variety of reasons. I don’t think the surrogacy thing is going to float with the Queen though. Or Charles. The legal reasons in the UK have already been mentioned, and I’m sure that’s why the Queen particularly and Charles would not pay for it. 

But yes, she’s definitely nothing without him. She has more to lose than he does if–actually when–this thing unravels. Harry will always be a royal; she will not.

image

emmasduerre:

Is this what people do when there are no wars to fight? Yeah. Yeah, this and other things. What things? They have breakfast. They really love a breakfast. And they love to wake up and read the paper and go to work. They get married, make some babies, grow old together. I guess. What is it like? I have no idea.

Do you think IF this tour is a major letdown, her sugars maniac following might decrease? And media reporters might finally start reporting that she needs major help with engagements? Basically what are your predictions if this tour is real letdown, coz I see a major possibility for that, due to main reason being no participation in engagements. It’s alright for 2-3 days to just stand and do photo ops, but maintaining public interest for continues 16 days without ANY participation is impossible.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

I think the hardcore sugars are here to stay, and I expect they will get more and more rabid as Meghan flounders. That has been my experience so far. 

I suspect the tour will be meh, but I doubt the media will report that she “needs major help.” Her problem isn’t that she can’t show up and shake hands. Her problem is that the planned tour stops mind-numbingly boring, the clothes are repetitive, monochrome and ill-fitting, and all she does is hold hands with Harry and pose. Yes, there’s always a chance that there will be a major disaster, but I doubt that as they will be surrounded by people whose main job is to keep that from happening. I think their main problem is boredom. Meghan is by far the most repetitive royal I have ever seen, and I used to bitch about Kate’s lace dresses nonstop.

When I think of what made Will and Kate’s first tour (to Canada) amazing, I remember how Kate picked Prince Edward Island based on the Anne of Green Gables books, and how professional she looked in her navy Smythe blazer (Canadian brand!) as they boarded the plane. The Cambridges positively embraced the official events, attending a citizenship ceremony, Canada Day, and the Calgary Stampede. Kate looked amazing in her recycled engagement dress and red maple leaf hat and she rocked the maple leaf brooch like nobody’s business. She wore Canadian Erdem freaking everywhere (tbh, they weren’t that bad back then), posed with Anne of Green Gables, and even dressed up like a Calgary cowboy. 

Yes, they had cute couple moments at the helicopter training, the French cooking classes in Quebec, and the sea dragon race, but what I remember most about this tour was that it was a celebration of Canada, including its natural beauty, history, and diversity. LOL, and the “Marilyn moment,” of course.

Kate launched her tour with a bang, with sources telling the DM that she’s personally chosen Prince Edward’s Island because she loved the Anne books. I remember this causing quite a stir at the time and this is still one my favorite parts of their Canada tour.

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/beloved-anne-of-green-gables-beckons-the-duchess/article2084268/?from=sec431

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/the-royal-consorts-royal-request/article598927/

It’s a stark contrast to the Harkle schedule release, which left people scratching their heads as to why they’d picked some of the stops and why they were skipping out on Invictus. I’ve been wondering why I have such a strong feeling that this tour will be a dud, and I think the underwhelming release of the schedule is part of it. This does not feel like a celebration of Australia, or event the Commonwealth. It feels like a celebration of Meghan and Harry.

This Zika thing is one big first world hype. Has a lot to do with big pharma too. This is planet is full of hundreds of millions of women who have been safely giving birth to healthy babies in zika zones. That said, it gives them a good excuse as to why she is not pregnant yet. I don’t think she wants a baby but she knows it would be strategic to have one.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Um, no. Zika didn’t become epidemic until 2015 in Brazil, and the connection to microencephaly wasn’t discovered until 2016, mainly because you needed a HUGE epidemic to get enough cases to make the connection clear. They still don’t know why it causes the microencephaly or what other effects it (or other mosquito borne diseases) may have on an unborn child. 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zika_virus

As a former resident of a Zika zone, I know these mosquito-borne viruses are difficult to predict. They will be dormant for years and then become epidemic and develop new traits. Dengue, for example, is usually a strong flu, but I had a cousin who almost died from a hemorrhagic dengue strain in the 80s. Chinkungunya is usually just a bad cold, but my aunt is still dealing with chronic arthritic paralysis from a weirdo strain that hit my hometown in the 2000s. Zika is usually a slight fever, but I have another cousin who ended up with Guillain Barre syndrome after infection, a side-effect that is even rarer than microenchephaly.

The incidence of side-effects like microenchephaly, Guillain Barre, and chronic arthralgia is often cited as a few thousand out of a million. That sounds small, but when you are dealing with a mosquito-borne disease epidemic EVERYONE gets it and the cases pile up quickly.

Yeah, if you live there, you kind of suck it up and deal with the risk as best you can, but no one thinks of it as “first world hype.” Yes, the diseases are a way of life in the tropics, like tropical storms. But we all know there’s a risk that this will be year that It’s not just a storm, but a category 5 hurricane that destroys everything. Likewise, we all know that there’s risk that our loved one will be the unlucky someone who gets internal bleeding, paralysis, or congenital deformations, instead of the annoying cold everyone else got.

“BTW, the “Paranoid Bride” Blind Gossip item from February was moved.” // Moved where do you mean? It’s still there, the link works. But yeah, doesn’t it just fit beautifully in with that new People whistle?

anonymoushouseplantfan:

If you use the Google link, it leads to an error page. You have to search within the website to get the blind.

And, yes, the blind is pretty much an early draft of the People article. I don’t think Meghan realizes that she just confirmed everything her friends, family, and colleagues have been saying since Day One. I think she truly thinks that it’s touching and relatable that she has finally found “the family she never had.”

I don’t think MM was set up with PH for sex or was an escort. I actually believe the story of how they met – I just don’t believe there was anything remotely resembling a blind date setup. Your opinion?

anonymoushouseplantfan:

I think there was (and likely there still is) a Soho House “dating list” somewhere and Meghan was a part of it. I doubt they called it “escorting” or anything like that, but it likely ended up being the same thing.

I don’t buy the blind date setup at all. Nina Crowne lifted the lid on that.

She said this in reference to an old article about Will&Kate spending 6 grand on drinks, but that’s not what I’m interested in. “She got it for much less because she got it from a friend – it’s mentioned in articles.” A. Did she just confirm our “tinhat” theories? B. Where are the articles? Point us to them for we need receipts for our tinhatting!

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Okay, is part 2 of a longer anon. I’m not posting the first part because I don’t want to post the blogger’s post or name. I don’t like getting into Tumblr spats.

I think the receipts you are asking for are about the engagement dress? Am I right about that? I’m not sure because the post you cite said the dress cost “25k” and the engagement dress cost 56k pounds or $75k.

If you ARE asking about the engagement dress. KP told the DM that the dress was “privately purchased.”

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-5202215/Meghan-Markle-Ralph-Russo-engagement-photos.html

The Independent noted that the palace had omitted some significant pieces of information.

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/meghan-markle-engagement-photo-couture-gown-ralph-russo-prince-harry-royal-wedding-a8123891.html

The Sun was the only one who added the “not from official royal funds” and “it is thought they spent nowhere near that figure.” It is unclear whether they got that from their palace “source” (no other outlet got that info), or if they are talking about some other “source.” 

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/5193527/meghan-markles-56k-braless-dress/

A lot of people thought that the dress was sent to Jess as a freebie and then she gifted it to Meghan, thus circumventing the “no freebies” rule, but, as far as I know, there was not confirmation anywhere.

However, People subsequently noted that royals cannot accept clothes for free. They also stated that they “understand” that, at least up to March 2018, Harry and Meghan were playing for her clothes independently.

https://people.com/royals/meghan-markles-royal-wardrobe-heres-who-pays-for-it-and-why-she-cant-accept-free-clothes/

As you can tell, the sources of the statements get cloudier and cloudier. KP is on the record as saying that the dress was “privately purchased,” but once you start to ask where the funds came from the statements are attributed to “it is thought” and “People understands.”

I think the cloudy sourcing is why people bring Jess into the equation.

afewreelthoughts:

asoiaf characters as john mulaney quotes

Ned: In terms of instant relief, canceling plans is like heroin.

Daenerys: The more you do stuff, the better you get at dealing with how you still fail at it a lot of the time.

Sansa: Part of me was like, whatever, you know. You know those days when you’re like… this might as well happen?

Arya: Because it’s the one thing you can’t replace.

Bran: I am very small, and I have no money. You can imagine the kind of stress I’m under.

Robert: I’m either having a drink or I have to pee. You’re living the golden years, kid, not me.

Joffrey: IN FACT, WE’RE GONNA FRAME YOU FOR MURDER, AND YOU’RE GONNA GO TO JAIL FOR 30 YEARS.

Catelyn: It’s a grid system, motherfucker. Where you at – 24th and 5th? Where you wanna go – 35th and 6th? Eleven up and one over ya simple bitch.

Petyr: And I said ‘no’. You know, like a liar.

Tyrion: I quit drinking cause I used to drink too much, and then I would black out, and I would “ruin parties” or so I’m told.

Jaime: I also don’t want me to be doing what I’m doing.

Cersei: Eat ass, suck a dick, and sell drugs.

Davos: It is so much easier not to do things than to do them. 

Stannis: We were at Lion King on Broadway and there was a five year old behind us going, “Look it’s Pumbaa! Look its Timon!” and my dad turned around and said, “Are you going to talk the entire time?”

Renly: I’m really sorry about last night, it’s just that I’m mean and loud.

Asha: *smashes a 40* SCATTER

Theon: I don’t look older. I just look worse.

Sam: Some people give off a vibe like right away they’re like “don’t fuck with me.” My vibe is more like “hey you could pour hot soup in my lap and I’d probably apologize to you.”

Robb: Oh, yes, and what a mighty king I will be, eating dinner at 4:45 in the afternoon.

Sandor: So my dad pulled up to the drive thru window and ordered a black coffee. The one thing no kid can ever enjoy.

Brienne: Thirteen-year-olds are the meanest people in the world. They terrify me to this day.

Margaery: I think Emily Dickinson’s a lesbian.

Loras: Well… you know how I’m filled with rage? I’m so horny and angry all the time… and I have no outlet for it.

Ygritte: Anyone who’s seen me naked and met my parents has to die. I can’t have them running around.

Arianne: I like to lean in and go “stop snitchin’ motherfucker” and walk off.

Jon Connington: I’ll keep all my feelings right here and one day I’ll die.

Aeron: Something happened here. You hope it was a miracle. Probably not.

Euron: This is an on-fire garbage can.

Victarion: Sometimes babies will point at me, and I don’t care for that shit at all.

Melisandre: If it’s a true or false question, you should be able to add a third option, which is… “Who’s to say?”

Jon Snow: The best thing about that was that after that, cars were pulling up and looking over to see who just did that piece of shit move, expecting to see like a 100-year-old blind dog who’s texting while driving and drinking a smoothie, instead they see a 28-year-old healthy man trying his best.

She has her own and KP pr to hype her relatively insignificant events. So how much longer does the pr tsunami continue? KP isn’t running all the US pr she is. At some point the money ends for that, right? They aren’t going to continue this pr effort forever will they ?

anonymoushouseplantfan:

It’s already dying down. I know it doesn’t feel that way because I post every little thing that comes up, but this is actually slowly winding down. Here’s how Meghan’s summer went

Interesting, no? The Irish tour barely made a blip. Her birthday was noteworthy because it was the first time she was seen after her Dad did his interview. Her best events other than that were the engagements with HM and Kate. The other big interest event was the hideous Oscar de la Renta gown. Weirdly enough, Hamilton barely gave her more press than the new dog and the Clooneys gave her no press at all!

I obviously follow this compulsively and post everything I see, but don’t let that mislead you. The outside interest in flagging. 

The truth behind Diana’s most dangerous infatuation | Daily Mail Online

motherofbulldogs:

Never forget! Diana stalked this man after he ended their affair. Diana was no saint. She portrayed herself as a helpless damsel in distress in the Andrew Morton biography, but there were plenty of twisted truths in that book that anyone should be skeptical of its themes.

The truth behind Diana’s most dangerous infatuation | Daily Mail Online

I’m sorry but if I was a reporter, I too would go with the train wreck…. why stay behind to follow a state visit where every second has been plan= safe.. when there’s a high tense ginger going bald and a Xanax popping actress trying to be hip. Please I would be carrying 🍿 🍺 in my backpack, probably making bets with my colleagues, and putting my camera on recording all the time. You know DM is probably sending a army to capture everything.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

That’s a good point!

Submitted;

anonymoushouseplantfan:

This has probably been said many times, but it seems like Harry and Meghan aren’t worried about some of us seeing behind the show curtain because they think the majority of people won’t look that closely. As long as they can get 1 relatively good picture. For example, Harry getting the children to hug Meghan, he knows most people won’t see/look for how he told them to. With Australia, lots of people will only see that they’re meeting young people, many people won’t see the awkward videos/quotes. Similarly with her clothes. I think it’s also the way Meghan chose the picture for her birthday thank you, it looks like she’s having fun, like the people she’s meeting are laughing with her/looking at her almost adoringly! A very different image from some of the videos!


Thanks for sending this in! Yes, the visuals are everything, but, personally, I don’t think these visuals are that good, particularly that thank you note. She’s dressed in black, the people are behind a fence, Harry is obscured. I can see why she chose it, but I think it’s a very off-putting image.

Yes, very off-putting image.

I just had a thought.. Just rewind your brain cells and go through how MUCH has happened since Catherine went on ML!!! Like holy fuckty fuck!!! Now when she returns, almost ANY criticism against her, or her work ethic, leaves, wardrobe etc have already been discussed and done and dusted by now!! She can easily just breeze in and start her work. Louis’ timing was complete genius!!

anonymoushouseplantfan:

It allowed her to skip out on most of the family drama and competition rumors. It worked out pretty well for her. 

I know I bitch about the long maternity leave (by US standards, I know), but it really is well planned. She bookended it with a royal wedding and ToC/AirForce appearances in May/June and she’ll come back in October to Eugenie’s wedding and a diplomatic reception. It subtly, but effectively, puts her in a completely different level than Meghan.

”Or it may have something to do with the wedding gown exhibit,which starts in October”.Oh,yeah That makes a lot of sense,I think she made another ‘BespokeGivenchy dress’ to attend the opening of the Exhibition with the Queen,Just as Kate did when she exhibit her wedding dress,H&M will go on the Tour on the 16th,so her engagement with the Queen will be a little before,to Hype the Tour and Harry ‘Commonwealth Job’ and MM ‘New Commonwealth role’ PR push

anonymoushouseplantfan:

True. OMG, I just realized that Meghan’s exhibit will be at Windsor DURING Eugenie’s wedding. That must be why they did it there instead of BP. 

No, it will be AFTER Eugenie’s wedding. That exhibition doesn’t start until October 26.

https://www.royalcollection.org.uk/whatson/page/1

so no wedding dress display at BP in central London for the Megsy dress? I really thought that dress was such a huge disappointment for a royal wedding gown. Then the 30 yds of mosquito netting. With colonialist symbols of all the former colonies on it. So politically sensitive. LOL Best to send it to the burbs at Windsor and then Scotland. But will the homeless be cleared out again when the dress comes to Windsor?

anonymoushouseplantfan:

I don’t know why she didn’t get BP.  Charles’ exhibit ends on September 30th, so she didn’t get bumped for that.

 Because Windsor Castle is open to the public year round. Buckingham Palace is not.

1)A lot of beaches on tour. Will they go for bikini pictures? 2) do you think they ever spent 18 days together? They will kill each other so long together

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Oh, that’s a good point. I don’t think they’ll do bikini pics, but I seriously wonder what shoes Meghan will wear to the beach.

It’s more than 18 days together. They’ll have to be together from October 12th (maybe even October 11th) through November 1st. Have to include Eugenie’s wedding (on the 12th) and all the travel time. 

I think this is as you said the post wedding tour. Harry is majorly competitive with William and often demands a quid pro quo whenever Will gets anything. I expect Harry MM to be marginalized slowly but surely after this tour. Kate will be back and the real royals will be the focus. The two celebs will visit “youth” and plant trees in tiny commonwealth nations.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Yes, I realize that, and I see how the big wedding and splashy tour feeds into that. But I’m still baffled by the Commonwealth Youth Ambassador title and the Queen’s Commonwealth Trust and the canopy. His “big” fundraisers have been for Sentebale and his wedding charities were small and many of them non-UK.

 Yes, it all looks like the same thing Will and Kate did, but it’s very different in substance. Will and Kate did a lot of fundraising for their foundation during their first year and then they went on to establish a strong charity base in the UK. They built a strong platform and developed their own institutions. Harry is not doing that. Heck, he’s compromising his strong Invictus platform to go plant trees for the canopy. 

William is building relationships with the UK business community. Harry is merching for Givenchy, and sucking up to the Clooneys and Lin-Manuel. Kate is extending her patronage to legacy UK museums, while Meghan is selling Jess’ crap Canadian brands.

I don’t think he will be marginalized. I think he already is being marginalized with these non-UK “positions” and “events.” This is what they’ve traditionally done with all of their problem family members.

filmgifs:

You must know… surely, you must know it was all for you. You are too generous to trifle with me. I believe you spoke with my aunt last night, and it has taught me to hope as I’d scarcely allowed myself before. If your feelings are still what they were last April, tell me so at once. My affections and wishes have not changed, but one word from you will silence me forever. If, however, your feelings have changed, I will have to tell you: you have bewitched me, body and soul, and I love, I love, I love you. I never wish to be parted from you from this day on.
Matthew Macfadyen as Mr. Fitzwilliam Darcy in Pride & Prejudice (2005)

The biggest political minefield are the royals. So yes mm will screw it

anonymoushouseplantfan:

I don’t know much about Australia, but it seems the expense is a big sticking point down under. They also seem to disclose EVERYTHING in a fairly timely manner, unlike Ireland or Canada. Cost is likely to be be biggest issue in this tour, and I’m not sure that Australia can justify it with a faux tourism boost, like the UK can.

That’s one reason why I’m so confused about the length of the trip and the fact that they are traveling to the boonies instead of sitting their asses down at a low-cost, already-paid-for, super-popular venue like Invictus. 

The plan was not for Harry to be marginalized but Harry’s idiocy has resulted in this. He was supposed to be Will’s right hand man when the time came and stay in the military til he was 40. He quit though and so the commonwealth gig was to acquaint him with foreign leaders diplomatic missions etc. Harry blew it. He is simply not bright enough to understand Will’s way is the right way and that the celeb BS is totally wrong way. Weak man easily influenced by the wrong people.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Maybe.