1_I remember Diana’s post-divorce life differently. There was a backlash brewing. Her peak pre-death was Morton’s book, “there were three in this marriage”, and people applauded the sale of her gowns (William’s idea) and her “revenge” dress. BUT, the royal side was getting a hearing as well – with the caution that Diana was hardly a long-suffering saint. Her Hasnat Kahn relationship was in the news with hints she was stalking him.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

2_there was some backlash to her Vogue pics by DeMarchelier, how she was now 100% celebrity, mastering the art of (fake) accessibility. Her lowest point was right before her death – remember Dodi was a known coke addict and womanizer, and his dad was persona non grata and a rumored arms dealer. She was playing it up. Nobody thought that would end well.

3_Even back then there was a “what is she doing” attitude about her social life, and how futile her pursuit of true love seemed when you really looked at her temperment, expectations, requirements and circumstances. She’d fall in with the Fayad-types (“Eurotrash” for want of a better word) as she did.

4_also, her antics with Tiggy were well known to the public and very unflattering, particularly as to the position it placed her boys. What elevated her in the end was what she did on AIDs, on mines, and her demeanor engaging the public whilst married to Charles, stuck. Markle’s demeanor with the public is opposite to Diana, try as she might to imitate her. Even if Markle died she’d have no chance at St. Di.


Very good points. Di’s imagine would be very different if she hadn’t died because the criticisms were piling up. 

The other thing to notice is in the upper left hand corner of the search – that number. For Givenchy you get 147,000 those are the number of sites that are talking bout her and Givenchy. That high a number is not happening by accident. Plus you see the same phrases repeated in all the articles – that is from the publicist. This is how you know she has pr working for her. And it is expensive too. See the game being played here? And she has played it since the affair was outed.

Oh, yeah. I’ve seen it before. AHPF has done a good job cataloging it. It’s so ubiquitous that we hardly even notice it now. This here is a good write-up that AHPF did back in January. I know she did some write-ups after the “statement” was released in 2016, but I just don’t have time to find them. 

image

PEOPLE won’t print the attacks on other RF members to keep their relationship with the RF cool so she goes to the down market like Star for the attacks stories. But you see how a single story gets pushed – that is her pr sending out emails to other publications/sites. It is all very obvious once you understand how it works. She wants that US market so her pr tends to be US oriented. Her willingness to use pr is a real problem for the RF they never had to deal with anyone like this.

Generally I agree with you, but People participated in the War of the Wales 25 years ago, so yes, they will participate in royal-vs-royal attacks. They’re not printing attacks currently because it doesn’t benefit them in anyway. If they could see a benefit in it, they’d do it.

The US market is the only possible market that Megs could make work for her. She’s not sophisticated or interesting enough for the world market. Also, an American in the British royal family being “popular” feeds American narcissism about being the best, which is also why many in the US don’t second guess Megs being declared “popular” in the UK. It’s just another version of “USA #1″ in the media. 

image

Submitted:

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Hi, sorry this is a submission!

I completely agree with you that post-divorce Diana is her aim, but I do wonder how she’ll get what she wants. If she’s the more guilty party, she’ll be the most unpopular woman in the UK. If Harry’s the more guilty party, no matter what she says he’s done, he’ll get away with being foolish. I don’t think he’ll ever reach the Charles-like “villain” because so many people see him as the boy behind the coffin. We’ve had these people asking Meghan to look after him, like haribo lady. 

Would it not be the same in the US? Because if she’s not liked, then the only thing she’ll have is fame/media hounding. So is it just for fame or profitability after the RF? I suppose it doesn’t quite compute in my mind because she might be aiming for Diana, but without that level of popularity wouldn’t it be so easy to fall into post-divorce Fergie?! 

I was only about 4 when Diana died, but I know people who have said she only reached this “sainthood” level after she died (I really don’t mean to be offensive, I think it’s quite common for people who die young). So for Meghan to have the Diana life, rather than Fergie, would it just come down to things like photo-ops on the diving board of a yacht?

I think I’m going around in circles here! Sorry about that!


Thanks for sending this in. Diana only reached “People’s Princess” status after her death, but she had a huge post-divorce “princess finally breaks free” pr drive in the US and that’s what Meghan is likely aiming for. 

Di sold her old clothes, cut her hair, toned down her makeup, got papped in jeans and gym clothes, ditched her UK charities and began doing more international humanitarian work, etc… She slammed up, got more sexy and wore the “revenge dress.” She started hanging out with celebs more. 

The whole thing was spun as finally breaking free from the stifling brf and becoming a superstar on her own. That’s the Di that became popular in the US. That’s the Di Meghan wants to be.

Diana also worked the age difference between her and Charles to her advantage in the press before they were divorced.

Has Kate gone to Wimbledon every year? Any year she missed?

duchessofostergotlands:

The only year she missed was 2013 because it was two weeks before George was born. 

In 2011 she watched Andy Murray: 

image

In 2012 she and William watched Andy Murray and Roger Federer in separate games and then her and Pippa watched Andy Murray in the final 

image
image

She didn’t go in 2013 because she was on maternity leave. 

In 2014 she watched Andy Murray and then the final with Roger Federer and Novak Djokovic 

image
image

In 2015 she and William watched Andy Murray again 

image

In 2016 she watched Serena Williams and then Andy Murray in the final  

image
image

And in 2017 she watched Andy Murray and then watched Federer in the final 

image
image

Fashion anon – she has little to attract them – she will wear something as a come on – see me and the coverage you could get if you pay me to wear it again. The articles in BBC WWD and WSJ about how much she can sell when she wears something are fishing expeditions for more sponsors. Her pr sends out emails to o push coverage so she gets lots of exposure which will attract the sponsors. Do a search for MM Givenchy and see how many places her pic shows up in. Pt 1

Pt 2 ultimately though she can’t maintain public interest – brands look at the numbers and hers suck. She cannot sustain interest especially without Harry. And she does not show clothes well. Too short can’t walk in stilettos and the makeup and mistakes generate too many negatives. Notice Prada did not feature her on their IG when she wore that Prada. She tries but she really is just a zlist celeb. Givenchy took her pic off their IG when she wore the wallpaper dress. But her reps keep try




This is what I got when I did the MM + Givenchy search:

image
image

Some are clearly referencing other previous Givenchy outings, but I totally agree with you. It’s really nice to hear someone confirm what others have been thinking. I’ve seen some of the same thinking over at @anonymoushouseplantfan. First Oscar de la Renta blocked comments on MM’s picture, and then they took down her picture completely

I suspect MM’s engagement on July 5th, and her engagements from July 9 through 11th are make-or-break for her on the fashion front. If she can’t look great, then I doubt she’s going to get anything else after. It’s becoming obvious to too many people that she’s a dud.

By the way, looks like Oscar de la Renta still has some anti-MM comments on that dress (with the model) photo

image

Guess since it’s no longer recent that they don’t care as much about it.

Thanks fashion anon!

yep – the christening with the Queen and the Midds church and the balcony for RAF again with the whole family and then a jam packed schedule in Ireland where people are disinclined to bend their knee. Plus the Irish schedule is heavy on high tech visits and places of profound sorrow (Famine museum) and the fight for independence (Croke Park). So many opportunities to screw up say the wrong thing in an environment where the political stakes are high (IRE). A minefield.

So true!

image

I think you guys are going too far, I don´t see drugs. What´s going on with M is a fertility treatment whose effects she is trying to hide with make up, plus her idea of being a “lady” and being pictured like that in every single photo. She overacts when she knows she is seen and has terrible taste. “I think he honestly expected her to be a superstar at this.” He still thinks that of her, remember he also thinks he knows what has to be done and how, he believes his own pr.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

I think another anon also mentioned fertility treatments. 

Really? If fertility drugs are the cause, then why–as others have noted–does Harry treat her differently? If it were fertility drugs, then wouldn’t he be more understanding since he wants kids. Something doesn’t quite make sense.

Anyway, the side effects for two of the most common drugs for IVF Cetrotide and Lupron can be found here and here.

you can tell she has her own pr running if you observe the patterns in the media coverage. The Good Housekeeping Harper’s Bazaar Marie Calare Elle Cosmo Town & Country nexus – all owned by the same publisher. All US media. All pushing the same narrative – she is accepted and the fashion icon Diana push. Note the UK tabs have not been playing the same tune the US media plays. US media downplays the family drama. She has her own pr running and eventually she runs out of money.

I’ve noticed. I’ve seen it mentioned over at AHPF quite a bit. I know I’ve reblogged some of it but certainly not all. 

Considering how frequently she has articles getting published over nothing, that money is going to run out pretty quick. Celebitchy only does articles if something has previously been published somewhere else. Megs had TWO articles today on that site:

  1. The Queen sees Duchess Meghan as someone ‘intelligent, polite & keen to learn’ (based on material from US Weekly)
  2. Star: Duchess Kate ‘feels threatened’ by Duchess Meghan’s popularity (based on the print edition of Star Magazine)

Considering the last one is STAR magazine, she must be running getting low on funds. She couldn’t get People magazine or US Weekly to run it. Not to mention that she doesn’t seem to want to wait until she has another engagement before having articles appear. It’s just constant bombardment. (Not a smart move.)

It may be that the UK tabs will kick in with the narrative they want to run when she can no longer pay for a pr agency to send things to US media. Like, she won’t disappear completely when her money runs out because then Fleet Street will seize their opportunity. She won’t have the funds to combat them and will be at the mercy of what the palace pr decides.

image

I think Xanax is a generic expression for her zombie appearance – the vacant stare the frozen smile weird affect. Harry has to constantly give her directions for even the simplest things (“bow now” on the balcony) and he is ever watchful when she is speaking to people like he doesn’t trust what she might say. Whatever she is taking (and she just might be stoned) she is not coping well with the situation she created for herself.

This is very true.

image

Climate change sinking Arctic archaeological treasures

archaeologicalnews:

A mad rush is needed to preserve or catalogue thousands of Arctic archeological sites before they are washed away by warming hastening the thaw of permafrost and coastal erosion, a study said Thursday.

For millennia, the cold has conserved ivory artifacts, driftwood houses and human remains in often near-perfect conditions.

But with faster and more severe climate change in the poles than the rest of the world, the situation has become desperate, with far more sites that will soon be lost than scientists have the time or resources to document.

“An increasing number of ancient sites and structures around the world are now at risk of being lost,” said the study published Thursday in the research journal Antiquity.

“Once destroyed, these resources are gone forever, with irrevocable loss of human heritage and scientific data.” Read more.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Hello dear Plant I’m sorry I don’t know how to send multiple pics, I did a research from Italy (there are some privacy laws that modify the Google search so it might be different from the States) of Vogue Paris and Meghan and you can see every time there is a press release it’s stated on the result. So it was very interesting. A lot of press releases about fashion brands, jewelry, makeup. I’ve researched also Kate on Vogue Paris and I found only one press release about her, that was the article of her and Char coordinating outfits. I will send you other pics next so you can see but you can probably do it better. 


Thanks for sending these in! I think many of these are press releases from the brands themselves, but the Diana and “psychological pink” ones are coming from Meghan. They don’t really support any brand. But one reason why we are seeing so much Meghan coverage is that all her brands are sending press releases. In this pic alone we have shoe, beauty and clothing brands e-mailing stuff.

Kate does do press releases, but they are usually about family or work stuff. Also, she usually wears established UK brands that don’t scorch the earth like this.

But it’s interesting to see how it works. Thanks for sending this!

The BRF at home have not lost any standing at all re Markle debarkle. No one is discussing in general media any of the points maade on here (which, by the way, I enjoy). The blog is putting MM and H at the centre of the debate, therefore centre stage. Not happening in the UK. Only interested when there is an event and that only in the tabloids. The US perspective on here is not reflecting the UK

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Thanks! Always good to have an on-the-ground perspective. I do think the “celeb vs. royal” debate has been going on for a while in the UK, though. I’ve seen several articles about it. The Spectator has had a couple and Hilary Mantel did some essays and someone else prominent who I can’t remember right now. I even found an Australian one.  This is just another slide down a slippery slope, imo.

https://www.spectator.co.uk/2017/05/made-in-windsor-how-kate-william-and-harry-became-britains-biggest-reality-tv-show/

https://www.questia.com/magazine/1P4-1970362860/the-trouble-with-miss-markle

https://www.afr.com/opinion/celebrity-monarchs-rule-20100131-iw40y

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2013/feb/19/hilary-mantel-duchess-of-cambridge

On the 27th,Katie Nicholl to VF ”What It Costs to Dress Like Meghan Markle:An Investigation”….’The royal family are understood TO HAVE COVERED THE COST of Meghan’s two wedding dresses/ Katie received a KP call,because on the 28,E! ”Here’s How Much Meghan Markle’s Royal Wardrobe Has Cost’…’It may be that Meghan contributed certainly some of the costs for either of those wedding dresses,or perhaps both of those wedding dresses” MM ‘Contributed with some of the costs’ LOLOLOL

anonymoushouseplantfan:

The merch discount was her “contribution.”

still say no baby but yeah everything you see now is simply prepping for the divorce. However – if she cannot get those luxury brand endorsements she is not leaving. She will cling. She should have given this up a long time ago but girl has no game and hung on too long. She should have broken the engagement and ridden out on a wave created by “I am woman hear me roar” BS.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Nah, she needs two years to establish herself as a “royal.” That’s partly why we have to many appearances with the family. 

And this is why I say Harry is going to dump her first.

I doubt the RF or Harry think her haplessness is adorable. And given it is just a month after the tacky wedding and Harry has given up the pretense that suggests to me that he already had lost the glow before the wedding. IMHO she cornered him with the race thing and the I gave up my job for you. And the predicate resentment over that has appeared. It will get worse. The trip to IRE will drive him up the wall.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

I think he honestly expected her to be a superstar at this.

she has done what 4 events in 5 weeks and 3 of those – TTC AWRDS Garden Party are what the British consider not work. So it will be hard to say all that money is justified by her work ethic. Especially when Kate who usually does more work than MM spends no where near that amount. The only ones trying to justify the expense are the US media – her media.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

anonymoushouseplantfan:

True.

Holy heck, the Givenchy cape dress was $20k??????? Her wedding dress what $440k????????? How in the world?????

https://www.harpersbazaar.com/celebrity/red-carpet-dresses/a21999929/how-much-do-meghan-markles-clothes-cost/

I saw Harry at the British Polo day yesterday. His team won their game. We heard Meghan was down by the tents “eating a sandwich” but didn’t want to come up to the main enclosure as people would stare. But who knows?! That was just the rumour as noone actually saw her. There was a lot of international royalty playing yesterday. This is the Audi polo anon from last year that no one believed btw! ;) Harry looked happy, relaxed, was gracious & friendly with everyone but no MM confirmed sightings

anonymoushouseplantfan:

OMG, thank you for dropping in Audi polo anon. I loved your anons last year You made that event a ton of fun!

According to Hello! she wasn’t there, but she may show up to other games because “she’s a fan of the game.”

https://us.hellomagazine.com/royalty/2018062849822/prince-harry-polo-match-where-meghan/

It wasn’t IMHO the engagement per se it is her whole situation that is causing her stress. An unreliable husband she manipulated into an engagement and marriage, a hostile family and public, the knowledge she is not doing well and her fear of the UK tablids (justifiable) and what may yet be revealed, no friends or family for support. Selling herself as something she clearly is not and unable to perform. Lots of stress. So she medicates.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Maybe E! is now lamesplaining the relationship with the father.

https://www.eonline.com/news/947147/the-truth-about-the-complicated-relationship-between-meghan-markle-and-her-father-thomas

Rachel/Megs got herself into this situation. She only has herself to blame. No one forced her to get engaged to Harry and marry him.

What Must We Do Now?

robertreich:

My friends, this is a dark hour. Intolerance, cruelty, racism, misogyny, xenophobia, and environmental destruction have been let loose across the land.

Trump controls the Republican Party, the Republican Party controls the House and Senate, and the Senate and Trump will soon control the Supreme Court.

Republicans also control both chambers in 32 states (33 if you count Nebraska) and 33 governorships. And in many of these states they are entrenching their power by gerrymandering and arranging to suppress votes.

Yet only 27 percent of Americans are Republican, and the vast majority of Americans disapprove of Trump. The GOP itself is now little more than Trump, Fox News, a handful of billionaire funders, and evangelicals who oppose a woman’s right to choose, gay marriage, and the Constitution’s separation of church and state.

So what are we – the majority – to do?

First and most importantly, do not give up. That’s what they want us to do. Then they’d have no opposition at all.

Second, in the short term, if you are represented by a Republican senator, do whatever you can to get him or her to reject Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, or, at the least, postpone consideration until after the midterm elections. Urge others to join with you. Senate switchboard: 202-224-3121

Third, make a ruckus. Demonstrate. Engage in non-violent civil disobedience. Fight lies with truth. Join the resistance. @IndivisibleTeam @swingleft @UpRiseDotOrg @MoveOn @Sister_District @flippable_org.

Fourth, don’t succumb to divisive incrimination over “who lost” the 2016 election (Hillary loyalists, Bernie supporters, Jill Stein voters, etc.). This will get us nowhere. We must be united.

Fifth, vote this November 6 for people who will stand up to the Trump Republican outrage. Mobilize and organize others to do so. Contact friends and relations in “red” states, and urge them to do the same.

Sixth, help lay the groundwork for the 2020 presidential election, so that even if Trump survives Mueller and impeachment he will not be reelected.

Finally, know that this fight will be long and hard. It will require our patience, our courage, and our resolve. The stakes could not be higher.

Who’s that girl? << The Madonna of the Palace

anonymoushouseplantfan:

anonymoushouseplantfan:

We reported a few weeks ago that some of the more old school members of the Royal household didn’t know what to make of the new Duchess of Sussex, so invented the nickname “Meghan The Menace”.

Their eyebrows have been raised further with Ms Markle’s choice of personal aide. Not a tried and trusted Royal adviser or an experienced aristo to help her navigate the choppy waters of royal etiquette, but someone from the celebrity world, whose biggest previous job was working for Madonna.

Buckingham Palace staff are already dining out on a tale of how Meghan’s new girl was calling up big brands and asking for freebies, as if her boss was in the cast of Love Island rather than married to the Queen’s grandson.

From this week’s Popitch


Whoa! Thank you so much for sending this in.

Here’s the “few weeks ago” item, in case anyone is interested: