Tag: am grudgingly adding a meghan markle tag on this post

She’s not pregnant, the pleats start at the neckline and finish at the rib cage, this making her boobs look huge. Then they start again at her abdomen, if she was pregnant, she dress wouldn’t be flat at her stomach. Also the way she’s standing does not help also, she is pushing shoulders back and hip forward… she definitely wanted baby rumors to start today.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Yep.

It would be nice if anyone suddenly thinking she’s pregnant would stop and realize that she looked like her super thin self just a week ago at the Hamilton event. That was eight days ago.

Can you imagine spending your life thinking ‘If I had all of the money in the world and a ton of events to go to I would look amazing and be adored all the time’ (because you know that was what MM was thinking during her years in the periphery of HW) and then actually getting all of that and looking like a perpetual fashion victim? The irony is delicious, it really is. Also, has anything ever better illustrated that money can’t buy you class or taste?

anonymoushouseplantfan:

I suspect part of the problem is that she thinks she thinks of herself as a designer who had her own clothing line. She thinks she knows better, so she doesn’t listen to the people advising her.

So sick of the hand holding. If you were at a regular place of business and you were married to someone you worked with would you walk around the office holding hands like this? No. This is how teenagers hold hands walking through the halls of their highschool. They look like immature morons trying to prove they’re so in love they must be connected physically at all times. Enough! At this point their only trying to prove it to themselves because no one else is buying what their trying to sell.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

They probably think it’s the most romantic thing ever, but it just looks unprofessional.

Submitted:

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Meghan looks somehow tranquilized and wired at the same time. Talk about magic.

She’s zoned out and trying to compensate for it. I wonder why she hit the Xanax this time. Are we getting another daddy interview this weekend?

Probably. Didn’t he give a 9-hour interview to the Daily Mail back in early August? And they probably haven’t published everything he told them as of yet.

Guys, Harry can’t ring up MI5 and ask them to play bodyguard to his girlfriend. I doubt Charles can either. This is MI5, the equivalent to the FBI. Just take a moment and think this through. The most likely scenario is that the bodyguard was RPO while Harry was there, and the Canadian cops when he wasn’t. Let’s not put it past Wendell to exaggerate the story to make it look juicy. He is an actor after all, trying to promote his show.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

I doubt it was Canadian cops. Wendell can tell a Canadian from a Brit.

Even if it was an RPO, it still means someone from the UK was shelling out money for Megsy to have that level of security, which she certainly did not merit.

KP alibi will be the security is “paid privately ” . It’s always like that. I don’t know for how long the BRF will do cover up for Harry and Meghan.Harry need to be spank hard hoping he will wake up that “not everything he wishes will be granted”

anonymoushouseplantfan:

They’ll likely try that, but is it believable?  I mean, look at the big picture. He flew an actress he’d just met to Botswana on a work trip, then he gave her royal security, then he flew to see her after an official tour, all in the space of a few months. He got away with A LOT. 

I’m beginning to wonder if this article will end up opening the door to more articles in Fleet Street exposing money shenanigans, particularly those by Megs and Harry. 

I don’t believe the Wendell MI5 story one bit. First, MI5 is for domestic counter intelligence & security. Why would they cover an American in Canada? They don’t even cover the royals in the UK! It’s like saying the FBI were protecting Harry in the UK. Wrong arm of security. Second, i can’t imagine Charles agreeing to pay for this. She probably had regular body guards like it was reported back then. This is Rachel. She likes security stories to make herself seem important.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Maybe, but I don’t think Wendell would mistake UK secret agents for Canadian private security. He’s an actor. He’s used to having security around.

Cui bono? That is, who benefits? Megsy does NOT benefit from this story. 

1) With all her clothes spending, she does not need stories circulating that she got more protection than Kate before Kate became engaged to William. And for an ENTIRE YEAR!

2) Megsy clearly cut Wendell off since he wasn’t at the wedding. More likely, he figures he has nothing to lose in telling stories about her when he worked with her on Suits. And he’s right, he doesn’t really have anything to lose. 

It’s not coincidence Wendell Pierce didn’t go to the wedding and now he’s spilling the tea. I suspect KP will issue a swift complaint to IPSO and the British press won’t pick up that article. But I’d LOVE IT if the daily mail did 😆

anonymoushouseplantfan:

I don’t see how they can bury it. It’s apparently an interview he did for Extra so there must be video out there somewhere. You don’t get more legitimate than first person recollection caught on video for a different publisher.

And what are they going to say? That they paid privately for Mi5 to follow Meghan around? Is that even possible? That a US actor mistook private security for Mi5? That’s pretty ridiculous.

Given the timing of this story, I’m beginning to wonder if anything else is just going to fall out of the cracks in the next two weeks. 

I don’t believe the MI5 story. Wrong arm of security agency. Even in the UK, MI5 don’t protect the royal family. I see Rachel’s hands all over this nonsense.

I don’t know if it was truly MI5, but I have no doubt the security was British. Like AHPF said, “As if a television actor would be impressed by American bodyguards. NBC has tons of them.” Wendell has been working in Hollywood for more than 20 years. He was in Waiting to Exhale with Whitney Houston. And that was back when Whitney was a superstar and hadn’t hit the decline that you saw in the 2000s. Wendell has been around long enough to figure out the difference between bodyguard employments. I have no doubt the security was British and not paid by NBC.

I’m just waiting on who run with this story first the Sun and DM. Fingers crossed for them to contact BP and CH for a comment and/or confirm tax payer money being used. 😂😂😂 I don’t think they will/should bother with KP, that office has been caught in too many lies already.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

I’m very curious to see who pounces on this and whether they let KP brush them off with a haughty non-denial. This is potentially a big deal. There’s no “they might have been engaged” here.

Well, maybe it was just a drop in the bucket compared to all the cash they’re letting her spend on her clothes… 

Even still, this girl racks up QUITE the expense bill!

Wow meghan got an MI5 agent every day in Canada for a year meanwhile kate was repeatedly harassed by a hoard of paparazzi on a daily basis for 10 years. Not to mention a misuse of taxpayers funds. I also find it funny that the chick was so scared in Canada but it didn’t deter her away settling down with the prince.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

LOL, and I was bitching about a couple of hours at Invictus. This would be hundreds of thousands in taxpayer money. There were rumors that Doria had RPOs in LA too. I wonder if those were true too. 

Yup. This chick gets whatever she wants and still complains. Nothing is good enough for her. Meanwhile, Kate really did suffer harassment for years.

Meghan Markle Had a British Secret Service Agent With Her on ‘Suits’ Set

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Every day since the day the relationship was announced? Reeeeeaaaaaalllllyyyyyyy? This isn’t an anonymous source. This is an eyewitness from the show putting his name on it. I wonder if anyone will comment.

When you think about all the harassment Kate received from the paparazzi, this is really ridiculous. 

Meghan Markle Had a British Secret Service Agent With Her on ‘Suits’ Set

Meghan Markle Had a British Secret Service Agent With Her on ‘Suits’ Set

keepingupwiththebananadrama:

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Every day since the day the relationship was announced? Reeeeeaaaaaalllllyyyyyyy? This isn’t an anonymous source. This is an eyewitness from the show putting his name on it. I wonder if anyone will comment.

Ah yes they leaked their own relationship and need MI5 protection. I’m not surprised by the abuse of power.

“As soon as it came out that they were dating, everyone was warned to stop talking or they would be fired”

I don’t find it a coincidence that Wendell didn’t attend the wedding and is now spitting out these details…

Screen shots of this article in case it disappears…

Meghan Markle Had a British Secret Service Agent With Her on ‘Suits’ Set

So MM is a hit and mostly misses w/ her wardrobe. It’s mind baffling on exactly why…I’ve come to the conclusion that she lacks conviction. If she was someone who knew who she was she would morph into her “Royal” version whilst keeping her personality. Others did the same Sophie, even Camilla, (I’m going w/ older generation, Kate and Diana weren’t even in there 30’s) She’s in her late 30’s but she dressed like she was in her early 20’s LA chic. It doesn’t translate well into modest royalty 🙄

Nope. Can’t say I’m surprised though. If someone offers her something really expensive to wear, she’ll clearly wear it even if it doesn’t fit well and isn’t suitable for the occasion.

image

Harper’s bazaar ”How Meghan Markle’s First 100 Days as a Royal Compare to Kate Middleton’s”..”The First Event Post-Wedding”,the nude Reiss dress that Kate used to meet the Obama’s at BP was incredibly successful and seeing photos side by side of MM vs Kate,Kate is effortlessly elegant and MM just a mess

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Oh, wow. This is a fantastic slide show.

https://www.harpersbazaar.com/celebrity/latest/g22854790/meghan-markle-kate-middleton-royal-first-100-days/

It’s so sad this years event was so underwhelming. Personally I do like this outfit but it’s just another expensive suit (why not recycle?). But more importantly, MM over shadows the kids and the charity. Last year we saw Harry really connecting and smiling with these kids, actually taking the time to learn and have a good time. This time it all seemed so blah and he’s just there by force and to show off this blah wife

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Compare the Harry solo pics KP tweeted here, where he goes down on one knee and connected with the children:

https://twitter.com/KensingtonRoyal/status/1037008375194820608

To the cringeworthy series of “chair” pics with Meghan

https://twitter.com/KensingtonRoyal/status/1037026069348528129

https://twitter.com/KensingtonRoyal/status/1037027112253906945

https://twitter.com/KensingtonRoyal/status/1037028353134477312

https://twitter.com/KensingtonRoyal/status/1037029291148627970

https://twitter.com/KensingtonRoyal/status/1037030681665306624

https://twitter.com/KensingtonRoyal/status/1037031671185465346

https://twitter.com/KensingtonRoyal/status/1037032694847287296

https://twitter.com/KensingtonRoyal/status/1037034162367201285

https://twitter.com/KensingtonRoyal/status/1037034902074662912

https://twitter.com/KensingtonRoyal/status/1037038142040297472

I think M was going for (her version of) a “professional” look. I actually liked the suit. Also, did you see the video of them arriving? PH was still greeting people when M walked out of the room/entry. She didn’t bother to wait for him.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

It’s the kind of suit (minus the satin top) that you would wear when you want to come across as powerful and authoritative. I don’t think it was the right outfit for this event at all.

She’s making really strange outfit choices. The Hamilton dress was more “date night” than gala and this was more TED Talk than anything else.

Submitted: Fake on the make

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Watching everything that has happened since the engagement, I can only conclude that Meghan is completely oblivious to the negative PR and public opinion. In her mind, she was separated from the royals at birth and has now finally been reconnected to the family she never had. She has to makeup for 36 years of bling and clothes she didn’t get. 

But stepping back and taking a broader perspective: there is so much corruption within the higher levels of government, corporations, media, etc. these days. Everyone is a fake on the make. The so called “liberal” media in the “free” world has been dead for several years. 

Corporate media is full of gushing articles on Meghan. The Daily Mail and possibly Yahoo are the last two places where the public can still express an opinion on a larg(er) scale. (For comparison, I comment a lot of Financial Time, but a really hot topic gets only a few hundred comments compared to DM thousands). Google search will not bring up blogs anymore unless you already know of the existence of the blog. Twitter, fb, etc. are not places where you can get reasonable analysis of anything.

I’ve seen for myself that in the biggest bank’s headquarters, senior executives are only concerned with hanging on to their paychecks. Every decision they make hinges on that one objective. Apart from a small number of entrepreneurs (and even many of those eventually sell out), you have to hustle your way up the hierarchy if you want to recognized as a mover and a shaker. 

Face it, Meghan is a small fraud compared to Lloyd Blankfein or Jamie Dimon, or even the Clintons with their pay-to-play schemes through the State Department. No, I am not a Trump supporter, I am a Julian Assange supporter and I was a Sanders supporter ….long live the liberal media for exposing all the shenanigans around the democratic nomination. Said nobody ever. 

Corporate media is composed of craven journalists also attached like limpets to their paycheques, They spew whatever narrative is required. I’ve seen “news reports” that have entire chunks cut and pasted from press releases. The media’s job is to protect institutional elites. 

75% (?) of the public buy every narrative they are fed, whether it is about the War on “Terrorism” or Meghan Markle “modernizing the monarchy”. Just look at the all the photos of European royalty playing dressup in their silly gowns, crowns and sashes

….fakes on the make, the whole lot of them.

Thanks for sending this in! I love the FT comment section and it’s so depressing that it’s only a handful of people chiming in. I also follow FinTwitter and a fantastic thread will get maybe 32 RTs, which is also sad.

The fakery is everywhere nowadays, which is downright scary. One reason I blog about Meghan is that it’s less stressful than commenting on Trump or Elon Musk or any of the other fraudsters. Meghan has little effect on my real life, my country, or its economy. The other have a huge influence. 

And the press is useless. I can sort of see why the royals get this worshipful pap because they are so secretive and finding real info is hard. I don’t understand it as to the other fraudsters. it reminds me of Chuck Price’s legendary 2007 quote “as long as the music is playing, you’ve got to get up and dance.” It’s good while it lasts, but eventually the music stops and the whole house of cards comes down.

“They must be insane to release a 1.5 million wardrobe expense at the end of the year. ” You know, I think the BRF might be leaking MM wardrobe costs on purpose. Charles was said to have done the same thing to Di back in the day, but no one cared because it was Diana! MM will get called out by the media for her overspending soon enough. They’ve done the same to Kate on a number of occasions. The funny thing is, Kate’s numbers are so low compared to Meghan’s haha

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Everyone cared about Di’s clothing expenses. They were a huge deal at the time and they enabled to Charles to cut her settlement quite a bit.

Not surprised by her lack of interest in charity rollout. Remember that she didn’t get to where she is by being NICE! Think of women you know who married powerful or wealthy spouses. They fall into three camps: (1) Childhood / school / same circle sweethearts (2) Matched pairs (both professional, or equally rich / powerful, and (3) opportunistic (he wants sex, youth; she wants $. Her romantic history has always been #3, it takes a certain type of person to be like this.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

That’s a good point, but I was thinking more in terms of her promo, which she is very serious and practical about. It’s interesting that she’s focusing on Australia (OMG, I just realized that the dog is supposedly named Oz, LOLOLOLOL). Instead of building up a charitable credit.

On the other hand, it was depressing to see how little you actually had to do to get the “humanitarian” label, so it shouldn’t surprise me that she feels she can skimp on the charity stuff. She got people to call her a humanitarian with little effort, but she’s been unsuccessful in attaining the coveted “fashion icon” label, no matter how hard she tries.

Submitted: She graduated…

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Her name appears on the NWU 2003 Commencement program with a Bachelor of Science in Communication from the School of Communication, formerly the School of Speech. It is in a long list of names and you will see the degree if you scroll up slowly, though the formatting is wonky. . 

It appears she did not do any double major but a vanilla Communications degree. 

US Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill visited Argentina in August 2002 right around her 21st birthday which explains why some articles say 20 and some say 21.

I don’t know if NWU has fall and spring commencement but she likely missed fall commencement deadlines and/or needed a couple more credits and so went for spring commencement even if she had already started auditioning.

https://www.nytimes.com/2002/08/07/business/o-neill-upbeat-in-uruguay-faces-tough-talk-in-argentina.html

https://archive.org/stream/annualcommenceme2003nort/annualcommenceme2003nort_djvu.txt

ps: several articles stated the internship was 6 weeks not 6 months, which makes more sense. 

Thank you for finding that commencement program! I knew I’d seen it around but I couldn’t .

I’d also add that most–if not all–universities and colleges in the US, require you to apply for graduation. You have to prove to the registrar that you have met the requirements for graduation. You do not inadvertently end up on the commencement program by accident.

Tarot reader update. The Markle mess has been delt with we won’t be hearing from them anymore. Harry having money issues Meghan’s spending has to stop. She’s not happy. Will and Harry have had a falling out Will didn’t agree to this marriage & told Harry he was rushing it that he would regret it. Kate is also not happy about how this has all turned out. Charles & Camilla are ignoring the situation bc Charles is worried about becoming king. Meghan is hiding a bad secret.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Thanks! This sounds like it could be accurate based on that recent leak from Thomas” curiously well-educated “adviser,” and that weird Tom Sykes article attacking Charles. Who is the reader? Is it on YouTube?

Naomi Tarot did a recent one. Much of what is said above seems to be in it.

It was easy for Kruger to turn Meghan into an humanitarian/feminist. She was a pretty Z-list starlet with a good education and no one cared enough about her to ask questions. No one was pissed off like Harry’s fans are. Now, every PR move is questioned, every speech is analyzed, every photo shot is scrutinized. I don’t think Kruger & Co would do much better than KP in the same situation.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Good point.

Bad day for MM Papa exposed her. This is going to stick too. Going to be hard to play herself as the great humanitarian when Papa has made it clear how cruel she was to him. Headline in UK tab INHUMANE. Think October is going to be even worse.

Well, I wasn’t surprised that another interview with Papa Markle was released this past weekend. This week overall is pretty unfavorable, including this upcoming Saturday and Sunday. 

I’m now wondering if there is going to be another round from Papa Markle given that there was an article about Doria moving to the UK to be closer to Megs.

image

I haven’t gotten a chance to read all the recent coverage, but given this article yesterday, I’m now wondering if Papa Markle is going to hit back more with another interview round this weekend. At this point, I suspect the article about Doria moving was just being floated around to see what the reaction was before it actually happens. But I can see Papa Markle being pissed since he’s completely out in the cold at this point. 

I wonder if those rumors of Doria being a felon are true. If so, then it could Papa Markle who exposes it by talking about it to the Daily Mail or some other Fleet Street outlet. He could totally talk about it, and then the rest of Fleet Street would have to verify it with legal records. If she really is planning on moving to the UK–and jumping ahead of thousands of other people in the immigration line–then her having a criminal record would be a serious issue I’d imagine.

image

Missy Percy (Chelsy BFF) and Thomas VanStaubanzee (close friend William) got divorced after two yrs for unreasonable behavior. But no actual indication of what the unreasonable behavior was ever was given. Unreasonable behavior in the UK really is the equivalent of irreconcilable differences in the US a kind of catch all. As for annulment- the CoE has all sorts of requirements for vows to be legit like using your legal name – which should have been Rachel and Henry those names were not used.

image

But the royal family is always held to a higher standard with their marriages than the aristocracy and other Brits. I can’t see the CoE allowing an annulment because the dimwits chose to go by their known-by names instead of legal names. But then there has been so much stupid shit with this relationship that I couldn’t have predicted anyway… 

Lol HoB, we’re already bored with the Harkles that we’re looking forward to their post-marriage shenanigans. You are right, I keep forgetting Megs is getting all this cos she has Harry’s support. I suppose I still wonder why he’s supporting her, I can’t imagine he was THIS desperate. Anyway, cheers.

There isn’t much left for these two to accomplish. All that’s left prior to a dissolution of marriage is an obliteration of these two (or perhaps just Megsy) by Fleet Street.

image

From M’s wedding speech: “Markle is incredibly close to her mother, and Nicholl said that, “I do know that she thanked her mother, not just for being there today, but for being there for her entire life. . . . It’s unclear if she made mention about her father, who was embroiled in a paparazzi controversy in the lead-up to the wedding before falling ill.” << <<< Mummy was there for M's "ENTIRE LIFE"? Yeah, except from ages 11 – 17.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Yep, it’s really interesting how all the anecdotes about the doll family, the feminist letters, and the “check-your-own box” are about the dad.

EXCLUSIVE: ‘Stop blathering!’ Meghan Markle says she isn’t falling for her father’s ‘crocodile tears’ or moans that she’d be ‘better off if he were de

anonymoushouseplantfan:

The “friend” is talking again. The problem is not only her family won’t stfu.

Yep. This is not a good look either. They are all horrible people and the worst part is that they are all horrible IN THE SAME WAY and they don’t seem to realize it. You can tell that they are all related.

EXCLUSIVE: ‘Stop blathering!’ Meghan Markle says she isn’t falling for her father’s ‘crocodile tears’ or moans that she’d be ‘better off if he were de

Ohhh snap! A UN video Megs did has surfaced, and in it she says “we need more men like my father, who championed my 11-year old self to do what was right” – hahahahahaha!

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Oh. My. God. This drama is so freaking crazy. This is all bs, of course, because it was A SCHOOL ASSIGNMENT. It’s brilliant that she credited her dad, though.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-6043141/Resurfaced-video-shows-Meghan-Women-campaign.html

Her BFF, Kagame, is also controversial.

https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/02/rwanda-paul-kagame-americas-darling-tyrant-103963

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/oct/10/paul-kagame-rwanda-success-authoritarian

https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2018/06/28/rwanda-deathly-hush/

That article about M’s childhood homes is working in Tom Sr.’s favor. Doria, though, is taking quite a hit.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Yep, the comments are very interesting.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-6012295/Photos-inside-Meghan-Markles-childhood-homes-Los-Angeles.html#comments

I’m kind of wondering if this article is prepping for a bigger article this weekend. Looks purely like an article for background information that can be referenced later…

I loved your analysis on if/when these 2 break-up. One thing that puzzles me is how far Megs got (a freaking marriage!) & how much she is getting away with (merching, embezzling from PC – allegedly). This to me indicates that there is an unseen variable(s) that is skewing all logical reasoning & all readings. Perhaps this is why many think she has something she’s holding over PH (or the BRF). It’s hard to believe it’s just all because he’s in love. But it could be that simple, occam’s razor…

Well, regarding the alleged embezzling, I think it’s good to keep in mind that not everything that CDAN publishes is accurate. There are always a lot of people in Hollywood submitting things to that site with various agendas. Those agendas are never held in check or verified by the publisher (CDAN) to ensure accuracy for the readers. There are a LOT of things submitted to that site that seem purely based on fan speculation or a pr rep needing to get a certain rumor out to benefit a certain pr agenda. I do not believe that everything published there should be taken as fact.

That said, I think what some people like to forget is that Harry got in this situation by not listening to what his family likely told him. Harry was dumb, lonely, and desperate to get married. So now he is. He could have waited to get married for another 6 months. If it’s the true love that Harry and Megs fans like to say it is, then there is no reason they couldn’t have had a wedding further down the road. Except they didn’t. And now it probably isn’t going to work out for a bunch of reasons including that Tweedledee and Tweedledum aren’t suitable for a long-term relationship. 

Prince Fuck-Up will do what he does best: fuck up.

image

No, the ask that Tumblr ate was basically everyone seeing 1 marriage for Harry yet his venus is in virgo… Great breakdown, thanks! I think one thing that makes this even more intriguing is that the BRF are not acting like we thought they would/should. Megs should never have got this far, yet here we are. They just might be outplayed by Megs during the break-up & she could get away with claiming violence, a separation prior to divorce or the first British irreconcilable differences divorce!

Let’s always remember that Megs got this far because she had one particular person behind her: Harry. 

As long as Harry is behind her, then the palace will be behind her. Once he’s not, then she truly has problems that her pr games will not fix. She doesn’t have the money or the power to take on the palace in the press. 

She’s not Diana, and she never will be.

image

couple things so please forgive if I make this a multi parter. Notice that Naomi as an example some tarot readers make assumptions that what they read in the tabloids is true. This affects their readings and makes them IMHO unreliable. a great deal of the tabloid coverage is flat out nonsense so I am tending to disregard these readings. I know that she is merching which is clearly unacceptable for a royal yet I have never seen a single tarot reading which picks up on this. Pt 1

Pt 2 I know she has a pr firm pumping out content like crazy especially in the US media. Anyone who knows pr can recognize this and also recognize where she is going with this – a very ugly divorce. Yet the tarot readers don’t see this. You however do not seem to be making these assumptions and so you seem more reliable to me. So to annulment. Harry’s best chance for his future is the annulment and the “sources” have been saying that will be the attempt. con’t

Pt 3 so kudos to you for picking up on that. She needs the “I a martyr to their suffocating ways just like Diana” divorce so how do they get to annulment? I’d bet Harry does not want to be seen as the bad guy so he won’t initiate break up what do you think? Consistent great observations from you – love it!

1) Which tabloids are you referring to? There is a wide variation in reporting amongst various publications. You have to consider that there are US and UK tabloids. Both of which come from a variety of angles.

2) As I understand it, tarot readers read the cards based on the questions asked. If the tarot reader isn’t asking about merching, then they’re not going to get cards about merching. I have seen references in Naomi’s readings about a possible loss of money for Harry and Megs. Some people assume that could be a loss of merching money. Generally, the tarot readers are going on about the relationship between Harry and Megs, and whether or not she’s going to bail or if they’re going to break up. I don’t know that everyone is aware of the merching issue outside of close royal watchers. And even then, some royal watchers give Megs a pass anyway. 

3) Regarding the pr firms, same thing. The tarot readers are reading the cards about the relationship between Harry & Megs. They’re not asking about whether or not Megs will run out of money to pay her pr firms. Or what new thing she’ll have them issue a press release on. That’s an entirely different issue. 

4) I think it’s totally possible that Harry initiates the process, but that doesn’t mean we’ll see it as publicly as we would like. He’s a fickle, whiny bitch. Once he realizes that his new life will always revolve around having to deal with his wife’s bullshit relatives and her drama, the newlywed glow just kind of instantly fades. I mean, does Harry get press on his own anymore? Not really. And that’s got to burn his inner famewhore to no end. Megs really has nowhere to go. The divorce process in the UK means that she can’t ditch people as easily as she ditched Cory and Trevor. Fleet Street will be on her ass, and once the palace pr isn’t going to protect her, things will be much more difficult for her on the public relations front. In fact, let’s remember that the reason she’s able to flood the presses with her pr rep’s emails is because the palace is backing her due to Harry. Fleet Street isn’t going to come at her with all the resources that they could when the palace is still backing her. Her only real audience is the US, but even then she pales in comparison to regular celebrities and the daily Trumpalooza. Odds are, she would get lost in the US press if/once Trumpy gets impeached next year.

5) Annulment itself only has a certain number of legal options per the UK.

image