Even if they were there, why weren’t they sitting in the quire where Meghan’s family is supposed to be? It’s unacceptable to me that if they were there MEGHAN stuck them in the back. Like, Serena Williams’ AGENT was sitting in the quire section across from the royal family, but if you’re a blood relation to the bride you have to sit in the back???
Well, I remember people complaining that Harry & Megs shouldn’t have really gotten a wedding in the Church of England this time because Megs is divorced, but they gave them a pass on it.
So, I’m sure it’ll be up to the CoE again to decide if they’re going to give them a pass on it or not.
Tina Brown says that the gospel choir was Prince Charles’ idea. Makes sense that he’d hav to encourage them to get their act together and suggest musicians & singers for them to include. Remember that the choir and ‘cellist were announced rather late. Note also that the harpist at the wedding was the official harpist to the Prince of Wales.
Well, the people you’re talking about have just straight up lied to people about an agreement, fake engagement, blackmail, etc.
I think the possibility of an annulment exists if this marriage implodes over the summer. We’ll just have to wait and see what kind of fireworks go off after the 4th of July.
Maybe. It might just depend how quickly this thing unravels. We’ll know for sure by the beginning of September I think. If Harry ever wanted to have a wedding in a church to someone else, then he would have to get an annulment or else he’d probably have to settle for a civil ceremony with a blessing afterwards like his dad.
Megs most certainly was on social media before she met Harry. She had both a twitter account and an instagram account. She had a lifestyle website called “The Tig.” Please learn how to research before you come to someone who actually reads something other than fanfiction for a living.
And as for why she’s a famewhore? How about this?
That’s Meghan talking PUBLICLY about a PRIVATE relationship to the glossiest glossy magazine in the USA. IF she wasn’t a famewhore, then why would she be on the cover, since as you just said “nobody knew who she was till Harry.” Oh that’s right, she’s a famewhore of the first order since she’ll sell anyone out as long as she can get her press.
No fucking way am I interested in dating, fucking, or marrying Harry’s whiny, petty, petulant, insecure ass. You go on right ahead pretending that he’s Mr. Nice Prince that would never ever have the Kensington Palace press office release all sorts of terrible, secret shit on Meghan when the day comes. And that day will probably come sooner rather than later.
You’ve got a lot to learn about the British royal family and the UK press my dear.
I think that’s one of the big advantages she has here. The BRF is used to dealing with people who resent small snubs like getting a bad title, or an ugly tiara, or no coat of arms, or a bad seat. Meghan DOES NOT CARE. All she cares about is the fame part of it–the BS Weekly covers, the merch, the photographers.
The rest of it is just not important to her. That’s why she had a crap cake and takeout pizza for her wedding. She only cares about the royal trappings insofar as they will translate into press coverage.
The problem I have with that is that Megs stopped being with Cory in 2016. Wedding happened in 2018. That’s a year and a half separation at a minimum. It seems really hard to justify that there’s an overlap causing a conflict with this marriage.
Does it mean that Harry was fucking Megs while she was still with Cory? I have no doubt that is the case. But Cory and Megs went their separate ways before an engagement happened.
The Queen has reigned for more than 60 years but nobody has a clue what she thinks about anything.
“Hiding information about a previous marriage” isn’t on the annulment petition. I’ve looked at it. Hiding a marriage would only be relevant if someone was still married to that person while getting married to someone else, aka polygamous marriage. The voidable options are directly posted above.
I can’t even find that on the supporting notes for the petition paperwork, and you can take a look at them here:
Let’s establish a few things about annulment first.
One, some people have said that Meghan was in a civil union/common-law marriage with Cory when she started up with Harry. I think the basis for this is that a lot of articles state that if you live together for a year in Canada while in a relationship that means you’re considered a common-law marriage/civil union. However, when I did some internet research, I found that provinces can regulate it. Toronto is in Ontario, and Ontario states that it must be a continuous relationship while living together for three years. Cory and Megs were only together for two years, so obviously that doesn’t qualify.
Two, what I found when researching annulments in the UK, is that there are 1) not legally valid marriages (”void”), and 2) defective (”voidable”) marriages.
So, since there is no reason the marriage between Harry and Megs is not legally valid, if Harry wants to annul this marriage, then he would have to go for a reason that the marriage is defective.
No one is going to believe that this marriage wasn’t consummated when they couldn’t keep their hands off each other during the wedding.
Megs definitely wasn’t pregnant by another man.
It’s going to be damn hard to prove that Harry didn’t properly consent to the marriage when they gave Megs a tour of the UK with all those engagements.
But “the other person had a sexually transmitted disease when you got married” option I think could be a winner! All they would need to do is have Meg’s sex tape released with lots references to her yachting past (”for a good time call X”) and there are LOTS of people who would be a) shocked and b) might even feel slightly sorry for Harry. (Although I think listing a STD as a reason for an annulment is kind of dumb personally.)
Three, looking for basis of annulments in the Church of England I didn’t come up with as much as I thought I could. I was basically able to find this:
So basically it sounds to me that if Harry can get this marriage legally annulled, then the Church of England will be able to annul it on religious grounds.
I don’t have as much time today to go into things as well as I’d like, but I do think the possibility of annulment exists here. I agree with AHPF’s mom that this relationship will be over after the honeymoon. As other people have noted, Harry wants a wife and kids and actually seems to have some love for Megs. Megs seems to love her new status and all the moolah and jewels coming her way. I do think the fact that Megs didn’t say “I love you” in the engagement interview is going to come back and bite her in the ass this summer.
I don’t expect the UK press to start taking serious potshots at these two until after Ascot. It could totally happen before that, but I think that most of the press will let them have a honeymoon period first. Also, the Trooping of the Colour is not too far away. Prince Louis will have his christening soon. Zara will probably have her baby (babies?) soon. There are several positive, happy events happening within the next 5-6 weeks, so no need to publish Meg’s past when you have readers willingly clicking on positive articles on the royal family.
But here are some dates of interest that we can take a look and start to gauge things this year:
The last full week of June (24-30): Look to see if Harry is treating Megs differently, and if Harry is dishing out cutting remarks about his wife. Maybe he’ll just be mad at Megs draining out his bank accounts by buying shit all the time.
22 July to 04 August: IF there is going to be an annulment, then we will have to see signs of it here I think.
10 to 23 October: IF it is going to be an annulment, then I would expect it to be completed maybe around this time frame. (No one is going to go for an annulment years down the road.) If it’s going to be a divorce, then perhaps papers will be filed around this time frame.
Charles is going to distance himself from that dumb-fuck of a younger son he has for the time being. He may get public pr points from walking Megs down a quarter aisle, but he knows Megs is a pr disaster waiting to happen.
OMG, are you kidding? She’s got to be one of the biggest famewhores I’ve EVER SEEN. She would not even invite her mother’s family to her wedding, so her mom had to attend while not knowing a single person there except her daughter.
Or the money of your father-in-law! She doesn’t have 5 million in the bank. People who say that have no idea what her expenses are for being an actor–management, agent, etc. Plus there are her living expenses, taxes, etc.
She’s richer than the average person in the US, but she is not 5 million in the bank rich.
I think Fleet Street will only throw soft punches from here until after the main royal events in June are done. I’m guessing after Ascot is over we might see a change. Probably late July or August for big shit for sure.
“The wedding was very well done and beautiful but I am really confused by some of the celeb attendees there. “Suits” cast, Beckhams, those I get, but Serena Williams, Oprah & the Clooneys too? I very much doubt they are close friends or good friends at all with those. “Invite close friends only” my ass. Their weding, their guest list – but I wish the KP didn’t release such contradictory statement.“ – Submitted by Anonymous
The Clooneys weren’t invited for the second reception at Frogmore, their name wasn’t on the list. And they had to wait outside Frogmore for almost 15 minutes…the problem were the pics that were published….Since it happened…Bubly, Poply, Poople thought about a way to fix, because someone read the website and saw the pics. So Meghan decided to dance with him and Harry thought it would be a great idea to ask Kate to also do it. #ThanksAL
Thanks for answering my ask! You said “he’ll hopefully see her for who she is” but how couldn’t he already?! –> Only God and his stupid father knows. She took pics from a secured area at KP and was about to publish online (the one thatvrelease this information was me), he saw and they broke up. Oh, darling…She called him excessively to apologize, he accepted/stalked. Can be loneliness and also lack of focus, work and so on. 😘
I hope you can answer these questions. How can PH/MM go through fertility treatments/IVF if they are (allegedly) using drugs? –> They aren’t frequent users. I don’t have a specific knowledge about, but I presume it does, since a drug acts on your central nervous system, and this net (CND) regulates your entire body. She was yripping with and that dress last night. Because she was drunk as a cow 🤣🤣🤣🤣 Also, why do you think MM will bolt? Imo, she will never have a better life that what she has now. As the wife of the 6th (5th) in line to the throne she wouldn’t get a huge divorce settlement (would she?). –> She is a fame whore, but I doubt she will please (did you realize that her career are only tips in tiny movies and/or movies that you never heard about? And deal with the bad press and scrutiny. She fucked io twice with HM (‘something borrowed’ gate and ‘curtsey’ gate) and that is something that the journos will make sure that she learns. 😘😘😘😘
You are the absolute tits 😘💋😍 –> Tits??? 😱😱😱 I love that you give us the scoop on what’s happening behind the scenes. Why do you suppose this wedding and engagement was so rushed? –> Harry and his desperation. Now, he will be desperate for it to work, then for babies, then for this and that. Agreed. Although, Harry is in love. Yeah! 🤣🤣🤣 What’s he like in real life? –> If you thought only positively about him, you might start to rethink. 🤣🤣🤣 He is an asshole! He was looking for one, he found it. Yes. 😘
Can M have private PR –> No. Yes. They all do. Oh, they do. Don’t worry 🤣🤣 I still don’t understand why Charles and Will allowed her to control KP twitter/press. –> Maybe because that dumnator got the password. Four palaces: BP, CH, St James and KP. All different staff. The last three are under BP, but side by side. Now, at least for a time of period, KP will go back to be under CH. When it will be effected? When big shots from KP start to leave. Fox is one and there are two more. These two weren’t even invited for the wedding. 😘
Like I said. That visit to oprah and the last minute invite to the wedding wasn’t for nothing. Oh no but they still innocent, and her interview is a bigger paycheck now that the wedding has happened.
Thanks for sending this in! I can just imagine the Royal staff scrambling to find stands and vessels that would make this crap cake look like something decent.
I’m still having a hard time wrapping my head around the idea that this is supposed to be a royal wedding cake. Oh, well, I guess it fits them to a “t.”
Obviously there will be no traditional wedding cake at any of their christenings.
What this wedding shows is that the royal family is open for business, but not in a great way. It’s widely known that it’s difficult to get access to the BRF, whether you’re a British designer or a celeb hoping to mix with them at an event. I use to work in the celeb branding/events industry in London and there’s no way any kind of money would’ve got you into W & K’s wedding.
Large charity donations by a mega celeb + repositioning M & H’s brand as international, well connected humanitarians = win win for both parties. I love a good wedding, but this wedding reeks of tack and vulgarity. I thought that the fake floral arch was actually quite beautiful but couldn’t help thinking that it was there as a ‘step and repeat’ backdrop for celeb arrivals!
This is not modernising the monarchy. Mark my words, there’ll be plenty of pay-to-play scandals to come.
THIS.
A lot of people suspected that money could buy you access, but it had to be A LOT OF MONEY and it provided very little access and you had to be super discreet about it.
Now they are merching cupcakes and private clubs and cars and middle-market Canadian jewelry and it’s A LOT more obvious. They did a freaking Jaguar ad!!!! Plus the guest list and seating placement, of course.
And, yes, it was deliciously vulgar. The whole point of the BRF is that they are supposed to be above tacky product placements and celebrity back-scratching. Harry and Meghan, however, are definitely not above any of that crap.
Yep, that’s what we’ve seen since the engagement announcement. The hot messes dig themselves into a hole and then the BRF swoops in and gives her a royal event to fix it. I think that’s going to be the way of things for a while.
Actually, I don’t think her relationship & living together with Cory meets the standard for common-law marriage in Ontario. Canada leaves it up to provincial jurisdiction.
Like I said before, I need to check the British law. Don’t forget Cory, she was in a civil union according to the canadian law. 😘😘
In Ontario, the Ontario Family Law Act specifically recognizes common-law spouses in section 29, dealing with spousal support issues; the requirements are living together continuously for no less than three years[13] or having a child in common and having “cohabited in a relationship of some permanence”. The three years must be continuous, although a breakup of a few days during the period will not affect a person’s status as common law.
I don’t disagree with you that a figure like that might come up in a google search. However, those celebrity net worth figures tend to be highly speculative and generally based on gross – instead of net – income. Honestly, I’d be surprised if she were worth more than $1M on paper before marrying Harry. She always lived in a modest rented home in Toronto, which, to me, is evidence against her having a seven-figure net worth.
wanted to put a picture but did not work. At w and k wedding, family and Friends got thé best Seats. How do you justify putting Oprah and clooneys etc before your mother’s brother and sister. Especially when you have no qualms using said mother for your pr. Diana would be mortified at thé end of thé day she was still an aristo what they did IS so rude.
Thanks for sending this in!
The Cambridge wedding was notable precisely because you had commoners sitting somewhat as equals with the royal family. That’s why it got so much praise as a family wedding.
The Sussex wedding is notable because the friends and family were all superseded by celeb guests. It was very Hollywood. That’s Meg’s environment. She ditched her normal family and friends for the C-list celeb circle of Suits in 2011 and now she’s ditching her C-list celeb circle for an A-list celeb circle.
Part 2/2 …Did you notice how QUIET it has been around her Coat of Arms? Haha, Daddy’s little escapade robbed her of that little treasure. Bet she held her breath until she turned blue… er.. ish, and Harry gifted her that aquamarine ring instead. Bottom line though: Meghan Markle’s Coat of Arms got cancelled. Boom. I’m baffled why nobody picked up on the radio silence on the coat of arms thing, it would have been plastered all over. Glad to have you back btw! 🙂
April 29th 2011, the Duchess of Cambridge wearing Alexander McQueen for her evening wedding reception at Buckingham Palace | May 19th, 2018 the Duchess of Sussex wearing Stella McCartney for her evening wedding reception at Frogmore House
The Duchess of Cambridge departing from Westminster Abbey in a bespoke Sarah Burton from Alexander McQueen gown and the Duchess of Sussex departing seven years later from St. George’s Chapel in a bespoke Clare Waight Keller from Givenchy
gown
Meghan is stupid. Her wedding dress will ultimately go down as boxy and potentially ill-fitting. The exquisite tailoring on Kate’s McQueen dress is more evident in comparison.
Moreover, choosing a French label instead of a British or Commonwealth one? Absolute PR fail. They keep trying to push the designer’s name Clare Waight Keller), but it’s who Waight Keller works for and who made it that is official. No one says Kate’s dress was a Sarah Burton dress!