Oh, yeah, I forgot about that. Been so long. Feels like it was years ago!

She didn’t look like she was going to fall over though. Just full of gloat from head to toe that you can see from a mile away.
Oh, yeah, I forgot about that. Been so long. Feels like it was years ago!

She didn’t look like she was going to fall over though. Just full of gloat from head to toe that you can see from a mile away.
Might as well. He’s got to know by now that she’s never going to get protocol right. Things like that are exactly why she had her pr peeps leak details about the “dumb” protocol things she has to do now.

Personally–the way this is going–I wouldn’t be surprised if next week or the week after if Thomas Markle hopped a plane to the London and did an in-the-studio LIVE interview with Piers Morgan.
And more interviews with Fleet Street. In person.
I mean, we can all see which way this thing is going…

Yeah, I’ve noticed it. It’s not new. I don’t know if I’ve ever seen her in flats though. I can’t think of an instance where she’s worn flats.
She’s sooo thin though.

Even in that bulky dress she’s looks super thin.
Yeah and with all the political stuff going on, there isn’t much reason to. Brexit and other government affairs take precedence for good reason.





If it was a different color, it would look so much better. Pale beige does nothing for her and just washes her out. Ironically, this one fits, but the material is so bulky on her petite body that it again looks like it doesn’t fit or that something is off.

The matching handbag and shoes don’t do any favors either since the color matches. She didn’t use anything to accent such a blah dress.
Harry looks better because he doesn’t wash out with different colors of his ensemble.







What else is she going to do?


Possibly. Megan Fox allegedly had an abortion a long time ago and went on to later have three kids.
Except that she’s a lot younger than the other Meghan.

I know it’s PER CYCLE, my dear. What I was saying is that IVF isn’t as perfectly successful as people seem to think it is. The results do not automatically get better after repeated cycles, particularly when you’re older.
http://www.smartfertilitychoices.com/ivf-success-rates/

Did you see the nice letters spelling out certain words in this picture above? You know, the ones saying, “ended up with a baby after a year of IVF treatment.” Multiple cycles does NOT guarantee a higher success rate.
You are also not calculating the side effects of what IVF does to women when you spout off statements like “90% chance of getting pregnant within two years of trying.” Not true. There are no such stats saying that. Please come at with me with an actual link instead of pretending that I can’t do math.
Also, Megs turns 37 next month. IVF success is always more difficult after 35.
Learn to deal with it.

They can’t use
surrogacy because in the UK the child(ren) would not legally belong to Megs. (http://duchessofostergotlands.tumblr.com/post/175846047225/theoretically-if-a-royal-lady-chose-to-use-a)
They’re probably not
going to adopt, so that basically leaves IVF.
I really wish people
would stop talking about IVF as if it 100% guarantees a baby. Here are some
stats from the US:

So that’s basically
a 1 in 3 chance likelihood that given Meg’s age, a baby would result from IVF.
Live birth is different from a conception rate. Conception rate is usually
higher than the live birth rate. But just because you conceive through IVF does
NOT mean you will be able to carry that fetus to term.
Here are some stats
from the UK:

Again, you’ll notice
that IVF does not even result in a baby more than half the time. The UK stats
are even lower than the ones from the US. Even regardless of the statistical
difference between the US and the UK, each facility will have it’s own success
rates measured in conception and live birth rates. But no facility has a 100%
live birth rate. That’s just unheard of.
IF she gets pregnant.

She’s not currently pregnant now since she was just photographed drinking alcohol publicly in Ireland.

Yeah, I’ve seen it. There have been rumors about her sex tape circulating for awhile. Supposedly Celebrity Jihad will publish it at some point.
https://houseofbrat.tumblr.com/post/173109979979/if-the-sex-tape-exists-when-is-it-being-released
https://houseofbrat.tumblr.com/post/173109969649/do-you-know-if-she-will-want-kids-or-is-this
https://houseofbrat.tumblr.com/post/173109924349/what-happened-to-the-dirt-on-meghan-markle-that
I think it’s quite possible that it gets released this summer. Obviously we won’t know for sure until it happens.
I imagine its worth diminishes as she gets older. No one would want to see her sex tape when she’s in her 40s and 50s when she looks old. The people who would make money off something like that have more to gain by publishing it when she closely matches (physically) how she looks on the tape than by when she doesn’t.
They have to look like they’re including her even if they don’t personally like her. They can’t publicly treat her like an outcast.

They probably won’t do that until next week at the earliest. They’ve got World Cup, Trump, and cabinet resignations in the meantime.
They can fill pages on Megs super expensive wardrobe later this month though.
I suspect she wore stilettos in this instance for two reasons

She probably would have been shorter than this field hockey player had she not worn heels.
Pt 2 She is now emphasizing her breasts (padded bra for sure) tight around the torso. Sex pot Meghan. Stuff she is now wearing suits her shape much better. But can she sustain this – she needs to give them a lot of press to justify the costs. And her inability to walk is still a problem. Harry is conspicuously looking at her feet all the time fear of her falling out of the shoes. Express even had an article about her inability to walk. She needs to get shoes she can walk in.
Express had an article on her wobbling on the cobble: https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/987065/meghan-markle-prince-harry-ireland-dublin-pictures-news-dress
I prefer a padded bra to seeing her nipples when she’s braless. Small mercies.
But this Roland Mouret dress doesn’t exactly look like it fits on top. It’s not smooth on top, kind of wrinkled. Looks like it needs to be pulled down or adjusted in some places. The color on her doesn’t help either. Kind of a washout.

And this suit looks pretty basic on her. I don’t understand how Givenchy justifies giving her this. It doesn’t look like a couture house suit with that scoop neck, at least to me.

Why the pumps on an athletic field? I will never understand this.
Thank you! 😘
That’s true! I could totally do that since I still need to get my dress.






(old ask)
I got a few, but actually not that many.
What are you, like, twelve years old or something? Is this the best you can come up with in an attempt to insult me? That I’m just angry because I’m not fucking Harry?
Bitch, please. I’m so not interested Harry’s whiny, insecure, public relations-needing ass.
I assume you suddenly have the confidence to go around to blogs that don’t like Megs based on the simple fact that she was able to get someone to brush her hair, do her makeup, and put clothes on her that fit, other than the more recent fashion disasters she’s been wearing.
Obviously you didn’t want to come here when Megs was wearing this:

Please, go ahead and celebrate your minor victory.
The remaining adults can still discuss the impending disaster ahead.

Yup. This relationship has clearly sunk after their honeymoon, regardless of wherever they did or did not go.
It wouldn’t surprise me if some super crazy shit happened between 22 July and 4 August, but particularly between 25 and 28 July because I have a wedding to go to and will miss possible said crazy shit. Like, it wouldn’t surprise me if it would happen when I can’t enjoy it. Murphy’s law and all.
It also wouldn’t surprise me if Harry decides he’s over it in the fall and decides to go for an annulment. Divorce in the UK is much tougher to get than in the USA. There’s only FIVE reasons available when filing for divorce.
Prince Fuck-Up has got to continue his current trend of fucking up…

Can’t say I disagree.

But I think her hypocrisy will probably be exposed/dissected in the UK press soon enough.




Pt 2 But the real problem is not just her fashion roadkill look it is her numbers. They are non existent – she is not catching the public’s interest. Can’t cure that either. The other problem is the extravagant wardrobe pr that is now everywhere – no designer wants to be associated with a controversial figure and MM’s extravagant ways is controversy not to mention the threat of “revelations” that is rumored to be happening soon. She could become untouchable.
Well, “fashion roadkill” actually comes from an episode of Sex and the City, so I can’t take credit for it. It seems completely appropriate in this situation though.

I know people keep on saying capris for the pants, but I always think of capris being a little loose and not completely body hugging. What she’s wearing just looks like tight jeans that are too short. Maybe it looks better close up, but I doubt it.
I’m curious to see what she wears on Thursday though. It’s make or break for her in the fashion realm these next several days. I would bet that she’s about to become untouchable after this next month, but we’ll see.


Palace pr will do it through the UK tabs. They won’t release it on Kensington Palace, Buckingham Palace, or Clarence House letterhead.

Oh, yeah. I’ve seen it before. AHPF has done a good job cataloging it. It’s so ubiquitous that we hardly even notice it now. This here is a good write-up that AHPF did back in January. I know she did some write-ups after the “statement” was released in 2016, but I just don’t have time to find them.

Generally I agree with you, but People participated in the War of the Wales 25 years ago, so yes, they will participate in royal-vs-royal attacks. They’re not printing attacks currently because it doesn’t benefit them in anyway. If they could see a benefit in it, they’d do it.
The US market is the only possible market that Megs could make work for her. She’s not sophisticated or interesting enough for the world market. Also, an American in the British royal family being “popular” feeds American narcissism about being the best, which is also why many in the US don’t second guess Megs being declared “popular” in the UK. It’s just another version of “USA #1″ in the media.

Pt 2 ultimately though she can’t maintain public interest – brands look at the numbers and hers suck. She cannot sustain interest especially without Harry. And she does not show clothes well. Too short can’t walk in stilettos and the makeup and mistakes generate too many negatives. Notice Prada did not feature her on their IG when she wore that Prada. She tries but she really is just a zlist celeb. Givenchy took her pic off their IG when she wore the wallpaper dress. But her reps keep try
This is what I got when I did the MM + Givenchy search:


Some are clearly referencing other previous Givenchy outings, but I totally agree with you. It’s really nice to hear someone confirm what others have been thinking. I’ve seen some of the same thinking over at @anonymoushouseplantfan. First Oscar de la Renta blocked comments on MM’s picture, and then they took down her picture completely.
I suspect MM’s engagement on July 5th, and her engagements from July 9 through 11th are make-or-break for her on the fashion front. If she can’t look great, then I doubt she’s going to get anything else after. It’s becoming obvious to too many people that she’s a dud.
By the way, looks like Oscar de la Renta still has some anti-MM comments on that dress (with the model) photo.

Guess since it’s no longer recent that they don’t care as much about it.
Thanks fashion anon!
So true!

I’ve noticed. I’ve seen it mentioned over at AHPF quite a bit. I know I’ve reblogged some of it but certainly not all.
Considering how frequently she has articles getting published over nothing, that money is going to run out pretty quick. Celebitchy only does articles if something has previously been published somewhere else. Megs had TWO articles today on that site:
Considering the last one is STAR magazine, she must be running getting low on funds. She couldn’t get People magazine or US Weekly to run it. Not to mention that she doesn’t seem to want to wait until she has another engagement before having articles appear. It’s just constant bombardment. (Not a smart move.)
It may be that the UK tabs will kick in with the narrative they want to run when she can no longer pay for a pr agency to send things to US media. Like, she won’t disappear completely when her money runs out because then Fleet Street will seize their opportunity. She won’t have the funds to combat them and will be at the mercy of what the palace pr decides.

This is very true.

Well, we don’t know for sure that she’s actually taking Xanax. I’m sure she was self-medicating with something, but we don’t know what it was for sure. But regardless, she’ll have a much harder time doing those engagements–RAF and trip to Republic of Ireland–if she’s on any kind of medication where she can’t talk normally to people.

This might be one of the best things I’ve read this morning. (Sorry, I have a couple stressful days ahead.)
But what you’re saying explains a lot of things. She’s still merching. I just CANNOT understand what any luxury brand sees in her though. I mean, do you know? She looks terrible in all of her recent outfits. Like that blue disaster she wore to the Spencer wedding…😳
But you’re definitely right in that she doesn’t have much time. She probably has two weeks–MAYBE three weeks max–as I see it before things get even crazier.
The summer of fire is here, and July ain’t going to be pretty for a lot of people (and much of August too). Like, if you’re in the US and live in an area that could be hit by a hurricane, start preparing now. If you know people who are having tough emotional times, keep in contact with them and let them you know you care and that they’re not alone.
Shit is already crazy, and I guarantee you it’s going to get even crazier.

Well, I don’t do tarot, but I understand the general gist of things. It seems everyone who does tarot cards on them gets things that don’t indicate a good or lasting marriage/relationship.
I’d be shocked if this marriage lasts a year.
