Tag: ask

They had many anons who drop so called tips then later on you see those same anons on another blog laughing about what they did.

I suspected as much. I don’t know why they put as much stock into some of their anons as they did. I got the impression that there were plenty of people– particularly recently–that just wrote whatever because they knew it would get published. I suspect that this one was also someone just telling them what they wanted to hear, and that one went along with it.

They opened themselves up to that can of worms though. They based what they were publishing on information that was impossible to verify and from people whose background they didn’t know. 

And then it backfired.

image

wow – the tumblr ppl did not create an agreement theory – they got it from two sources one of whom works in pr and heard it through the pr grapevine. The two ppl had been credible with their info prior so they are willing to buy it but still look for info to support it. And they do not see Harry as innocent. Every time I come here I see bashing of those bloggers but they rarely mention other blogs.Why y’all need this? Should be room for other points of view. Otherwise – this is a nice blog

Well, I think we should be clear regarding the point in time when the “agreement” theory came about, it was when Harry & Megs were dating. I’ve actually written about it before in regards to someone before: https://houseofbrat.tumblr.com/post/172140441069/i-can-tell-you-harry-did-have-an-agreement-with

An “agreement” while they were dating, and Megs was touting the relationship left and right in the press is believable; an agreement regarding a royal engagement that uses taxpayer funds to prepare a wedding is not. 

I completely disagree with you on them seeing Harry as innocent. I’ve seen #FreePrinceHarry and other references to Harry being a “victim” of Meghan. Can’t prove it at the minute because two of those blogs are (temporarily?) deleted. 

Yes, they’re entitled to their point of view; however, I’m of the opinion that they have also strung people along to get them to believe that they have access to information regarding this “fake engagement/agreement.” They don’t. 

Which do you think is more believable? 

Option A: The British royal family decided to have Harry become engaged to Meghan so that he could break off the engagement and dump her more publicly because she blackmailed him into marriage.
Option B: Prince Philip at almost 97 years of age dies from post-surgery complications–possibly a pulmonary embolism–in mid-to-late April. Due to the mourning protocol, the wedding is postponed. The wedding is rescheduled for a date in the fall. Megs & Harry’s relationship burns out over the summer, and they break off the engagement and cancel the wedding.

image

Someone said this on Skippy’s blog today: “14th of April. I cannot give you proof, I can’t tell you any more details and I’ll tell you up front I am masking my IP. I can’t risk my job. But when you talk about an end date. I have to say I had a little giggle when I realised that is also the date of the sinking of the Titanic.” This is interesting because it fits your timeline. You said something will happen around that time.

Oh this: https://iamstillskippy.tumblr.com/post/172658389446/14th-of-april-i-cannot-give-you-proof-i-cant

image
image

I don’t expect anything significant on the 14th. I suspect someone is just trolling them, and they’re too dumb with their desperation to believe it.

I think the 20th – 21st – CHOGM ended so won’t interfere with that. Plus Cambridge #3 should have arrived and will distract a bit. HM’s birthday so she won’t have to be at any family celebration. But yeah the 17th sounds good too. Also avoids HM’s birthday even better. But this is ending. There won’t be a wedding. She’ll show for the 6th and maybe the youth forum but it is clear this is done.

I can’t say that the Queen’s birthday on April 21st will be a happy occasion for her this year.

Between april 15 and 22 kate will give birth and because you see a death too i have a bad feeling that might be not philip. Hope i’m wrong.

I think you’re making things up in your head. There is nothing wrong with Kate. 

Most articles put the likelihood of Kate giving birth in late April. Even Meghan’s friend Lainey mentions today Kate giving birth in late April.

If I was going to harbor a guess of when Kate is going to give birth–which is something I’m not really interested in–then I would guess between 0900 on 22 April and 0900 on 24 April.