I wouldn’t say they would necessarily put up a front. But I do think the reality of the situation will fully sink in. Whatever positive vibe Harry enjoys in private will probably be gone.
10th month of marriage would be March in my book. March 19th would be their 10-month anniversary of marriage.
I don’t think she’s pregnant. She doesn’t look it to me. I don’t see any weight gain, and her boobs look like they haven’t gotten larger. So, I don’t see any reason why they would announce a pregnancy if she’s not pregnant.
Yup. I concur. Megsy doesn’t have anything really special to hold people’s interest. I don’t think it would even have to take Harry remarrying for her to lose status. I think once he is out and about on a regular basis with a girl in public that she would lose her status and disappear.
The fact that she hasn’t been photographed with the Queen speaks volumes. Megsy can have her pr put out article after article saying she’s the Queen’s favorite; however, she hasn’t been pictured with HM The Queen since right after her wedding. (Group appearances don’t count.)
I wonder if Harry & Megs will go to the Polish state visit. I think it might depend on how their big tour down under goes. Or the state of their relationship knowing those two can’t behave properly anyway.
Meh. Sarah Ferguson, Duchess of York, used it quite a bit in the US when she was doing ads for Weight Watchers years ago. Back then people remembered she was part of royalty, and that was how she got endorsement deals to shill stuff.
Yeah, I don’t buy a US tour at this point either. If it hasn’t been announced, then there’s no guarantee it’s happening. I would imagine that the Queen and the Foreign Office would want to see how the currently scheduled tour to Australia, Fiji, Tonga, etc., goes before publicly announcing anything else.
Those two are going to be fried after 16 days in public. Whatever charm they start out with will be spent by the time they get to the very end.
I don’t think she’s ever going to get a solo engagement with Charles. Certainly not at this point. And she’ll never get an overseas solo trip. There’s no benefit to the royal family for that.
I don’t think she’ll be able to have a kid either.
Your last line there is key: “the US would ignore all that.”
Exactly.
Asking Americans to care about the difference between Meghan, TheDuchess of Sussex, and Meghan, Duchess of Sussex, is pointless. They’re not going to care because the important word of distinction to Americans is “duchess.” Americans are not going to care whether or not a definite article is placed before the word “duchess.” The fact that someone is using the word “duchess” in relation to someone is what is worthy of note.
No one in the US is going to stop Megsy going around calling herself Meghan, Duchess of Sussex. That girl will use it until she dies.
Harry’s second marriage won’t get St. Paul’s. Charles & Diana had to use St. Paul’s because Westminster Abbey was too small for the guest list. Also, Charles wedding was basically a state affair.
From this article, I think it’s important to remember that the author does both Western and Vedic astrology at this point in time, but when he made his prediction regarding Charles & Diana on the radio, he only did Western astrology at the time. He doesn’t talk about Charles’ chart in detail at all, so if you’re not familiar with it, then you might think that this 7-year-itch thing is the only possible technique to predict marriage dissolution. So let’s take a look at Charles’ chart then.
Charles has a Cancer ascendant, his ascendant lord (Moon) is in the 10th house. His 7th house (marriage/partnership) is ruled by Saturn. Saturn is placed in his 2nd house (Leo) in Magha nakshatra. Charles’ Venus is debilitated in Virgo, but it does receive some help with Mercury (Virgo’s ruler) since they are in a Parivartana yoga (mutual exchange).
Charles didn’t have the best chart for marriage before you get to planetary transits. His 7th house lord (Saturn) is placed in another maraka house (2nd house). 2nd house is also a financial house. Leo is ruled by the Sun. Sun and Saturn are in different planetary camps (in Vedic system). Sun belongs to the devas, and Saturn belongs to the asuras. All in all, it’s not a very favorable indication for marriage, and basically points to divorce, which we all know at this point happened.
When the author talks about Harry & Meghan’s dashas at the end of his article, I don’t think they’ll be married at that point, so it probably doesn’t matter. I think it’s more significant to consider Harry’s Jupiter-Saturn dasha, which goes from May 2027 to November 2029, and it’s relationship to William. The 11th house is the sign of the older brother; the 3rd house is the house of siblings in general. Saturn rules Harry’s 3rd house (Aquarius) where it is placed in his 11th house (Libra). Saturn is exalted in Libra, and it’s maximum exaltation is at 20 degrees. Harry’s Saturn is at 19 degrees and 12 minutes Libra, so it is at its maximum exaltation. I’m more willing to bet that William at this time is already Prince of Wales when Harry starts his Jupiter-Saturn dasha.
Then I think it’s necessary to take a look at both Charles & Williams charts & dasha sequences. In January of 2029, Saturn will be in Aries transiting Ashwini nakshatra, which is where Charles’ ascendant lord (Moon) is placed. Charles begins his Saturn-Saturn dasha on January 16, 2029, while Saturn is transiting his Moon, and I don’t think it’s a good sign. Because Charles’ Saturn is a maraka (death-inflicting planet) by its ownership of the 7th house, and it is placed in another maraka house (2nd), it probably has serious death-inflicting capabilities. Couple that with William beginning his Mercury-Mercury dasha on February 19, 2029. Mercury rules William’s 10th house (career). I think it’s likely that William will have a sudden change in his career in 2029.
To bring this back to Harry, Harry lost his mother (Diana) during his first Sade Sati (late 90s/early 2000s). Sade Sati is when Saturn transits the house 12th, 1st, and 2nd from the natal moon. I think it’s just likely that Harry will lose his father during his second Sade Sati, ten plus years from now.
I think the the tarot card “10″ probably refers to October. I think it’s possible/likely that the marriage between Harry & Megs is over in October–at least behind the scenes–but that getting to actually commit that end to paper will take a few more months. Perhaps the total number of months they’re married before the paperwork is finalized and accepted is 10 months.
I’m still betting on an annulment. It would make the situation easier on the BRF long term. She won’t get to keep a title. Harry could marry someone else within the CoE without needing to just get a blessing. Megs would just be something to be forgotten eventually in the UK.
I’m not going to harbor any guesses as to what could or couldn’t come out. Since you mentioned it, I think the UK press doing an article about the merching with Jessica Mulroney is probably a big possibility. Megs will probably be wearing different, expensive, couture ensembles multiple times a day. Writing about the huge cost of her wardrobe for that tour practically writes itself. It’s a 16-day tour. By day 7 the press will already have seen almost half of it. Multiple articles could easily be written. And it will be very easy to point out that Kate works with a much smaller budget.
I know that tarot readers have said that secrets will be revealed–as in things Megs is hiding that Harry doesn’t know about–but I’m not convinced that those are the kinds of things that will instantly come out in the press. It’s certainly possible. But it could be just revealed to Harry and the royal family and not the press at that stage. Perhaps the press just writes about it later. We’ll just have to see.
Here are two of Naomi Tarot’s most recent readings regarding Meghan’s secret.
The Sidereal zodiac is currently 23-24 degrees behind the Western Tropical zodiac. That’s because the beginning of Aries in the Tropical zodiac depends on the spring equinox, which moves gradually over time due to the precession of the equinoxes. Sidereal zodiac doesn’t move.
It’s possible for someone to have a Scorpio sun in both the western and Vedic systems, but it would just depend on the degrees within the signs. If someone had their sun in the very last few degrees of Scorpio in the Tropical zodiac, it’s likely that they also have their sun in Scorpio in the sidereal zodiac. Just depends on what degrees.
You just have to follow what you want to follow. There are definitely more resources for Western. I’ve only ever studied Vedic, but I bought a book on Western astrology aspects by accident. Because of that, I can follow what some Western astrologers are saying even if I don’t completely understand their methodology.
I don’t know that there is a lot of info on Tumblr for Vedic astrology, but there is plenty on YouTube. Sam Geppi, Kapiel Raaj, and Joni Patry all have channels. You can always see what they have to say on their channels.
I’m not going to get my expectations up about October at this point. Money laundering is really hard to prove in newspaper articles, particularly since no one can order the royal books open for review, even after what happened with Air Miles Andy.
It’s so disappointing. People in the UK might buy it to support the Grenfell victims. People in the US will probably only buy it if they’re Meghan fans. The only person who truly wins is Meghan in this scenario since she has “HRH Duchess of Sussex” in a very, visible font on the cover with her picture.
The real goal should be helping these people get into permanent housing to help their families, not perpetuate their temporary living conditions.
No idea. Every time I think I know what stupid thing is going to happen next, I learn there’s more stuff. I thought her sex tape and more nudes were going to come out and cause trouble this summer, and instead it was her father.
I’m also not sure that we’ll find out publicly. Perhaps it’s just Harry and the royal family who finds this thing out, and it’s not published at the time…?
I think it’s technically his non-profit, Make It Right, that is getting sued. I’m not sure how much liability Brad actually has with that since it’s a separate organization. The public relations, however, regarding it definitely aren’t great.
Meh. The alleged, college first marriage wouldn’t change anything at this point.
Megs isn’t older than she claims that one is old news from 8-9 months ago when people would freak out about her 8th grade graduation photos because they didn’t realize that some schools in the US do 8th grade graduations. Her birth certificate with her birth time was verified by astrologers. Megs hasn’t lied about her age. Get over it. Sounds like stupid, conspiracy theories by people who don’t understand how birth certificates work in the USA.
Harry’s not a hostage. Just dumb, lonely, and desperate to get married and start a family. Plenty of other men and women around the planet have made similar mistakes in marrying people they shouldn’t have.
Harry’s mistake is just more public than everyone else’s.
Yes, a chart can be read with the Moon as the ascendant. Or if you really want, you can pay someone to do a chart rectification to figure out the birth time based on life events.
If it’s just a specific question that you want answered, they can do a chart based on the time of the question also. (Horary astrology/prasna)
Oh, I’m sure the BRF has said “no” to those two multiple times. People just don’t stop and realize that they let Harry get married in a rushed manner because he was probably threatening to go all Diana in the UK tabloids if he didn’t get his way. That would have been a huge scandal, so they let him have what he wanted.
He got his way, and now those two dunderheads have to behave like proper royals. That’s the department Megsy is truly struggling in. She said she wanted to hit the ground running, but so far she hasn’t even announced a patronage. She hasn’t done a solo engagement.
She is, however, able to manage painful smiles when surrounded by sick kids though.
I’m sure Charles will arrange for her to get some money, basically to keep her mouth shut. They already know she’s a loose cannon and is not someone to be trusted. I’m sure there will be a very tight non-disclosure agreement signed before they kick her out the door.
I only remember the Madonna-flag picture from an MTV “Rock the Vote” campaign.
I think if she did anything with the Union Jack, she’d look like a Spice Girl.
Megs just doesn’t excel at looking royal. I think she’s always going to look trashy because she just doesn’t have good taste. And all she really wants is $$$.