For the wimbledon bingo! Inappropriate giggling, white dress- Ralph Lauren, Bald spots, messy curls, grabs Kate, Kate faces, fake tan.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

God, Meghan looks awful. The hair’s unbrushed again. 

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/6767363/meghan-markle-kate-middleton-serena-williams-wimbledon-ladies-final/

Did I post the anon who was concerned about Kate being associated with Meghan’s trainwreck? I don’t remember. I meant to comment that I thought the contrast actually benefited Kate. Today’s engagement is a perfect example. Meghan looks awful and Kate looks amazing.

Meghan Markle displays flawless tour de couture during Dublin visit – but where were the Irish designers?

anonymoushouseplantfan:

“However, one obvious missing link in an otherwise flawless tour de couture was the glaring lack of Irish designers incorporated anywhere into her wardrobe. Wearing forest green for your first night just won’t suffice as flying the Irish fashion flag when you’ve displayed outfits worth over €10,000 over the course of 36 hours.”


At least someone noticed. I don’t know why she missed this incredibly obvious thing. It’s particularly glaring when she did local designers during her “regional tour” and the “Meghan Effect” was touted everywhere. Yes, they were all put forward by the London Fashion Council, but it’s not that hard to google for a local bag or necklace. Heck, the press was making lists for her. 

It’s also going to look horrible if she “champions” Australian designers during Invictus.

Meghan Markle displays flawless tour de couture during Dublin visit – but where were the Irish designers?

Nope. No Irish brands as of yet. And isn’t the tour kind of over now? It was basically all overpriced, “bespoke” ladida that looked like an insult to stuff sold at ZARA. She diiiiiid however do another Strathberry bag (with the plastic still on), I suppose she thought Scottish/Irishputato/potato, they’re all pale and ginger right. And did another “celtic” merch. Except, Strathberry is DESIGNED in Scotland, but manufactured in good ole Espania, like most “craft” leather products here.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Well, Scotland isn’t Ireland by any stretch of the imagination. I don’t care how Celtic it may be. It’s a different country. They were also the only UK designer she wore, no?

The tour is over, but they may do a photo at the airport saying goodbye. I’m kind of shocked that there wasn’t even one Irish designer. I thought that was a given and the tabs and People were making lists of designers that she may choose.

https://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/style/celebrity-fashion/irish-fashion-designers-meghan-markle-12862868

Fashion anon back – same guy owns Givenchy and Dior and those houses are very controlling won’t give you their stuff unless the also supply the hairdresser makeup so you look good. That explains her transformation – she has a Dior/Givenchy supplied hairdresser. I am surprised she was a fail just two weeks ago but the Givenchy connection made at the wedding must have paid off. That wedding was a merch fest and advertisement rolled up in one. And it worked. Pt 1

Pt 2 She is now emphasizing her breasts (padded bra for sure) tight around the torso. Sex pot Meghan. Stuff she is now wearing suits her shape much better. But can she sustain this – she needs to give them a lot of press to justify the costs. And her inability to walk is still a problem. Harry is conspicuously looking at her feet all the time fear of her falling out of the shoes. Express even had an article about her inability to walk. She needs to get shoes she can walk in.




Express had an article on her wobbling on the cobble: https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/987065/meghan-markle-prince-harry-ireland-dublin-pictures-news-dress

I prefer a padded bra to seeing her nipples when she’s braless. Small mercies. 

But this Roland Mouret dress doesn’t exactly look like it fits on top. It’s not smooth on top, kind of wrinkled. Looks like it needs to be pulled down or adjusted in some places. The color on her doesn’t help either. Kind of a washout.

image

And this suit looks pretty basic on her. I don’t understand how Givenchy justifies giving her this. It doesn’t look like a couture house suit with that scoop neck, at least to me.

image

Why the pumps on an athletic field? I will never understand this. 

Submitted:

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Which do you think it is, Plant? Do you think she randomly chooses an outfit without thinking about the event, or does she think about the event and deliberately chooses something that will be inappropriate? I thought she looked good today for another, different, event. And she should have padded the front of her dress to tamp down the permanent high beams. Instead she wants to emphasize them, with the tight top and her posture. Harry is also clearly trying not to hold hands with her, but she keeps doing it. Pretty certain he told her to put her dress back on her shoulders in the carriage at Trooping, too, but she refused. In one shot, he’s looking at her shoulders in dismay and she looks absolutely stubborn, looking straight ahead with her chin in the air. Tungsten seems to have problems with rules and authority, which could be why the Suits people were so frustrated with her as well.


Thanks for sending this in!. I suspect she doesn’t have the “feel” for this kind of events. When you’ve attended weddings and funerals your entire life (even as a member of the middle and/or upper classes) you have a feel for what is and isn’t appropriate. Ditto if you’ve been watching these events on television all your life.

Meghan hasn’t done that. She was raised in a hippie household and likely never attended formal events. This was probably her first baby christening EVER. it was definitely her first military event. The Spencer wedding was her first country wedding. She just doesn’t have a feel for it. 

Looking at recap of all her appearance outfit on royal dish that someone made since invictus. Even with the last 3 being nice color and her best looks. There’s nothing special at all about her she underwhelming really bad if you see all her looks

anonymoushouseplantfan:

She has not delivered on the fashion stakes at all, which is bizarre because she has spent a shitload of money and gotten most everything custom. I think the GOAT dress and the Lady Gaga dress were the only off-the-rack looks, other than the casual polo outfits. 

I was expecting her to pic one coherent look and one designer and build her “uniform” so to speak. Instead she has been all over the place. She started with black pants before the wedding, then went into demure pinks with tons of buttons and tablecloth corners and stuff, and now she’s going into severe shapes in colors. She went from messy bun, to messy waves, to actually looking like she brushed her hair now. She went from natural look, to dewy ingenue, to bronzer queen. She is ALL OVER THE PLACE. Plus she has barely any UK designers and she is spending tons of moolah. 

Kate, weirdly enough, is the one who settled on one uniform (the McQueen coat dress), which she just keeps wearing to death. She is turning into HM. I suspect she was always heading this way, but now it is more noticeable. I think the contrast with Meghan fast-tracked this.

“is she carrying leather gloves? IN JULY??????” — Well, what did you expect? She’s WASPing now. No self-respecting WASP straight out of the 50s would go anywhere without gloves. Come to think of it; remember Angie donning satin gloves last week? lol And I sniggered so badly when I saw her doing her “lady Angie” schtick. Now it’s Meghan copyig the same “feel”. Dude. Only Lilibet still does the royal glove schtick. It’s July. We’re in the middle of a heatwave. Dude, LEATHER gloves???

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Good point.

I think “Fruity dress” or “Fruit salad dress” would be a more open option for the bingo. Because she’ll probably keep going for the rotting fruity pastel shades now that she’s trying to project her suits-script onto her royal script. A Fruity dress encompasses anything from banana, snotty passion fruit, watermelon, overripe half-squashed pastel strawberries, maybe we’ll even be graced with a watery lettuce salad dress – which would technically fit the “salad”-part. :) /Optimist anon

anonymoushouseplantfan:

We had an anon last week who said she would probably switch to bright colors now because Season 1 was Meghan being super serious and trying to do a good job in black, Season 2 was Meghan being “in love” and trying to fit in in pink, and now Season 3 is Meghan breaking out the bright colors because now she is confident and a seasoned royal. I suspect that anon is right.

Ok, it’s the day after so I took a look at Megs dress again. First, I really had to scroll to find the article on DM, second, I concur 100% with your anon who said that this outfit is good, FOR HER. But comparing to what a lady in her shoes should dress like, it’s another fail. Like you said Plant, we’re grading on a curve

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Look, it’s not an IKEA duvet topped with toilet paper. That’s all we’re saying.

Celebitchy has an article on M today. She’s making excuses for the cost of her clothes.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

LOL, it’s “racist” to think that it’s too much money. And they bring up Kate’s clothes too. Dude, THE WHOLE POINT is that Meghan is spending ten times Kate’s yearly budged in six months, THAT’S THE WHOLE POINT.

Kate was famously wearing Reiss during her first year–heck, she recycled her engagement dress during the Canada tour–and she was STILL criticized for spending too much money. Kate was absolutely dragged for that 50k bill and it was a small fraction of what Meghan has spent. 

And let’s not even mention that Meghan looks like absolute crap in her expensive couture. Her best looks so far have been the Halo dress, the blue off-the-rack Roland Mouret, and the black capris at polo this weekend. According to Katie Nicholls, Megs is now in the market for a stylist. That means she knows she’s royally fucking up. LOL, this is now the fifth person they’ve brought in to help. 

https://www.celebitchy.com/583255/does_duchess_meghan_need_the_couture_clothes_to_accentuate_her_new_power/

keepingupwiththebananadrama:

anonymoushouseplantfan:

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Okay, the segment starts at 25:00. It’s not very interesting except for the epic awkwardness between the hosts at the beginning and the co-host saying “okay, time to talk about Meghan Markle, another chance for Melanie to get more hate messages.”

Okay, at the end of the video they start talking about the Givenchy and Melanie goes “I can show you my tweets” because she has been swamped with troll attacks. LOLOLOLOL

Do all Californians and people who move to California have bad taste in clothes. Geez that one chick thinks Rachel looked amazing while wearing floaters on her arms

Fashion roadkill – that is brilliant. And yeah that article is a throw MM under the bus but also a call for more “youthful” designers to send her their stuff and pay her to wear it. At 37 she is a tad pushing the “youthful” vibe. But hey since the classic Audrey Hepburn look did not work for her she’ll try something else. So we saw her in a more “youthful” pair of capri’s from the 90’s today at day 2 of polo. You know any 20 somethings who wear capri’s? I don’t. PT 1

Pt 2 But the real problem is not just her fashion roadkill look it is her numbers. They are non existent – she is not catching the public’s interest. Can’t cure that either. The other problem is the extravagant wardrobe pr that is now everywhere – no designer wants to be associated with a controversial figure and MM’s extravagant ways is controversy not to mention the threat of “revelations” that is rumored to be happening soon. She could become untouchable.




Well, “fashion roadkill” actually comes from an episode of Sex and the City, so I can’t take credit for it. It seems completely appropriate in this situation though. 

image

I know people keep on saying capris for the pants, but I always think of capris being a little loose and not completely body hugging. What she’s wearing just looks like tight jeans that are too short. Maybe it looks better close up, but I doubt it. 

I’m curious to see what she wears on Thursday though. It’s make or break for her in the fashion realm these next several days. I would bet that she’s about to become untouchable after this next month, but we’ll see.

image

Meghan Markle has gone from chic to a fashion disaster

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Jess is now throwing Meghan under the bus. It’s every man for himself now, I guess.

This article is one part throwing Jess Mulroney under the bus, one part merching preview, and one part mea culpa on Meg’s fashion disasters.

Her engagements in the next few weeks are probably still make-or-break for her in the fashion world. No designer wants their pieces looking like fashion roadkill over the next five months.

Meghan Markle has gone from chic to a fashion disaster

Straight from the horses month “meghan markle chats to glamour about vb dresses, her personal style and her fashion cringe moments”. Make what you will of it but this gives context and foshadows her currently “style”. My take away is that she knows exactly what she is doing.. Why arn’t people looking into this? This is insane.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

http://www.glamourmagazine.co.uk/gallery/meghan-markle-interview-about-suits-the-outnet-and-her-love-of-clothes

Thanks for the Throwback Saturday, anon. That interview is so bizarre in retrospect. It really illustrates how Meghan SAYS all the right things, but then she doesn’t execute AT ALL.

Here she is on what she supposedly learned from the Suits wardrobe department.

That lesson didn’t stick at all. She clearly does not know what looks good on her figure.

Here she is on recycling and mixing and matching:

Another one that didn’t stick at all as we’ve had expensive new pieces on pretty much every single outing.

Here she is talking about craftsmanship:

This is the most ironic statement EVER. The “work” has spoken for itself in the past couple of months and what it has said is not nice.

Oh, and this is why she moved from blacks to pinks:

That’s why she went from blacks to pinks. She was re-enacting her Rachel Zane plot line. If only she’d re-enacted the wardrobe too.

Fashion anon – she has little to attract them – she will wear something as a come on – see me and the coverage you could get if you pay me to wear it again. The articles in BBC WWD and WSJ about how much she can sell when she wears something are fishing expeditions for more sponsors. Her pr sends out emails to o push coverage so she gets lots of exposure which will attract the sponsors. Do a search for MM Givenchy and see how many places her pic shows up in. Pt 1

Pt 2 ultimately though she can’t maintain public interest – brands look at the numbers and hers suck. She cannot sustain interest especially without Harry. And she does not show clothes well. Too short can’t walk in stilettos and the makeup and mistakes generate too many negatives. Notice Prada did not feature her on their IG when she wore that Prada. She tries but she really is just a zlist celeb. Givenchy took her pic off their IG when she wore the wallpaper dress. But her reps keep try




This is what I got when I did the MM + Givenchy search:

image
image

Some are clearly referencing other previous Givenchy outings, but I totally agree with you. It’s really nice to hear someone confirm what others have been thinking. I’ve seen some of the same thinking over at @anonymoushouseplantfan. First Oscar de la Renta blocked comments on MM’s picture, and then they took down her picture completely

I suspect MM’s engagement on July 5th, and her engagements from July 9 through 11th are make-or-break for her on the fashion front. If she can’t look great, then I doubt she’s going to get anything else after. It’s becoming obvious to too many people that she’s a dud.

By the way, looks like Oscar de la Renta still has some anti-MM comments on that dress (with the model) photo

image

Guess since it’s no longer recent that they don’t care as much about it.

Thanks fashion anon!

Fashion anon here again – she is working for luxury brand sponsors and working ti hard. Note her pr and its orientation. So to me that signals she knows her days are numbered and she needs a settled financial situation. She isn’t getting any big settlement from him. So October looks good to me. She knows too the media are coming. She hasn’t much time.

This might be one of the best things I’ve read this morning. (Sorry, I have a couple stressful days ahead.) 

But what you’re saying explains a lot of things. She’s still merching. I just CANNOT understand what any luxury brand sees in her though. I mean, do you know? She looks terrible in all of her recent outfits. Like that blue disaster she wore to the Spencer wedding…😳

But you’re definitely right in that she doesn’t have much time. She probably has two weeks–MAYBE three weeks max–as I see it before things get even crazier. 

The summer of fire is here, and July ain’t going to be pretty for a lot of people (and much of August too). Like, if you’re in the US and live in an area that could be hit by a hurricane, start preparing now. If you know people who are having tough emotional times, keep in contact with them and let them you know you care and that they’re not alone. 

Shit is already crazy, and I guarantee you it’s going to get even crazier. 

image

Meghan wore that dress at Wimbledon in 2016 where she was jumping seats and ended in Serena’s box one seat away from Anna Wintour. She later said in some American breakfast TV that when it started raining Anna gave her her cardigan to cover that suede dress

Ah, THANK YOU!! I wasn’t convinced it was a recent photo, but then the outfit is such a repliKate that I wasn’t sure. I mean, she actually looks healthier in that pic from two years ago than she does now, but I thought perhaps that it was taken at polo yesterday. Guess not! 

Meghan Markle isn’t the style rebel fans hoped she’d be — and that’s okay

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Vox, of all outlets, has an apologia on Meghan’s crap style. It’s apparently supposed to signal that she belongs. I think the elements Meghan has chosen–80s stylings, color coordination to a ridiculous extent, mismatched designer flourishes–actually does the exact opposite.

Meghan Markle isn’t the style rebel fans hoped she’d be — and that’s okay

1_I am really enjoying the Jolie/Markle comparisons because Markle reminds me SO much of Jolie in public. The ludicrous out of touch pronouncements too – remember how Jolie’s under-five kids were versed in world affairs and each had their favorite foreign language in which they were becoming fluent? But you know who is not enjoying themselves?

anonymoushouseplantfan:

2_SUGARS. They’re not having fun. They are probably pumping each other up in private while expressing anxiety in pms. They are a fandom – we all know how those work. They wanted to see Harry Meghan do the Cambridge stuff, make appearances, interact, be playful together, laugh together. The Cambridges didn’t cling but were clearly a unit.

3_The Sugars are not having fun because the pda with Harry and Meghan is “off” and they know it. There is no eye contact, no he says something and she laughs, she says something back and he laughs, people around them enjoying it. It’s weird. Sugars are looking for their romantic “fix” and it’s not there. Every time they have an appearance Sugars hope they’ll get more but it’s always the same.

4_so I know they are disappointed. The politics of fandom mean they can’t admit it to the whole fandom, but you know little clusters of them worry among themselves. Added to which her fashion fails, and the rest of the RF giving them the Big Chill, this is not playing as they expected.

5_Sugars may play the race card, but that would only work if Meghan truly looked great, but her looks were being picked apart anyway. Or if she were clearly doing a stellar job but getting unfairly dinged for not being robotically perfect. However, Meghan is a hot mess and they can see it for themselves, both fashion and job performance. So they are left with spinning themselves.


I can’t speak as to the politics of fandom, but I do think Meghan set some expectations that she cannot hope to meet now. That’s part of the problem.

Another part of the problem is that Meghan is “getting” stuff based on absolutely nothing. The fun part of watching the seating arrangements, events, loaned jewels, family orders, etc… is that they were supposedly based on work done, personal relationships, discretion, lack of scandals and stuff like that. Meghan is “getting” stuff based on absolutely nothing–heck, she’s likely getting them because she’s a complete fuck-up and needs the extra help–and that makes the “gets” absolutely meaningless. It’s hard to fan-girl that.

Why do you dislike Meghan so much? Has she done something really bad? I’m sorry I just don’t keep up with the royals so I’m not understanding why you don’t like her.

What is there to like? Crappy fashion? Bronzer overuse? Turning her back on the Queen in public?

She’s a famewhore who can’t stop famewhoring. 

image

https://houseofbrat.tumblr.com/post/174130350604/youre-such-a-dumb-stupid-bitch-how-is-meghan

https://houseofbrat.tumblr.com/tagged/markle-stans

Meghan is doing it right now matter how you want to flip it. She is trailing the Queen and Her Majesty clearly agrees to it as well as having her own personal ex aide guide her. Meghan wants to get this right and is bringing in her dream team from DAY ONE! Meghan’s only been an official Royal for 2 weeks and she’s already shitting on Kate’s entire first two years!

image

I don’t care that this ask is a few weeks old. I knew Megs would fuck up spectacularly and resort to repliKate. Articles are already being written on how Megs doesn’t know how to be a duchess original. She can only copy Kate for success.

Yeah anon, as last Saturday showed, Megs is really putting the fear of god into Kate, who is–no doubt–going to spend another week with her children not at all worried about Meg’s future fuckups this summer.

What’s going on around the waistline of that dress? The fabric looks puckered.

I’d say “what waist?” since she doesn’t have much of one. But it looks like there is a design embroidered around the waist/torso on the front. 

image

But really, she does NOT have the figure to pull off something like this. It literally looks like an oversized blouse with a belt. 

Givenchy has got to be rubbing their eyes against the wall wondering why they gave her this. She’s going to make all the fashion houses look bad every time she wears something of theirs.

motherofbulldogs:

motherofbulldogs:

On the left is the promo shot of the Oscar de la Renta dress. On the right, is the Duchess of Sussex wearing it. Note that in the promotional photo it is shown as a drop waist dress, but Meghan is wearing it in a blouson style. Looks like she picked a drop waist dress that is too long for her to wear as drop waist (looks like the hem might drag if she did), so she’s wearing it blouson style, which is not flattering. Makes the dress look like it is swamping her.

Just looked at the links for the dress (Moda Operandi’s site and Vogue’s slideshow of the collection) and realized that this is a 2019 Resort dress! In other words, won’t be available for purchase until the fall. How common is this for royals to do this? I’m trying to think of a similar situation. This is common with celebrities for them to borrow and wear the sample, but royals??

Good catch @motherofbulldogs!! 

Moda Operandi literally says “Expected to ship Oct 9, 2018 to Mar 14, 2019″.

motherofbulldogs:

On the left is the promo shot of the Oscar de la Renta dress. On the right, is the Duchess of Sussex wearing it. Note that in the promotional photo it is shown as a drop waist dress, but Meghan is wearing it in a blouson style. Looks like she picked a drop waist dress that is too long for her to wear as drop waist (looks like the hem might drag if she did), so she’s wearing it blouson style, which is not flattering. Makes the dress look like it is swamping her.

Some of the press is saying she looked awful yet according to the DM she stole the show

anonymoushouseplantfan:

I think they are just stirring the pot. The best rated comment has 10k likes now.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-5853123/Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-steal-Princess-Dianas-nieces-wedding.html#comments

She’s wearing a bedsheet with a wad of toilet paper on her head.

I don’t understand how she thought she looks good when she left Nott Cott.

Lainey ”If the goddman not-really-that-off-the-shoulder pink dress really would have been a problem with Her Majesty,Samantha would have stepped in’…Samantha will be blame too,when/if MM messed up on the engagement with the Queen

anonymoushouseplantfan:

LOLOL, they are furious about the inappropriate comments. Dude, anyone can tell that the dress was wrong. We haven’t seen off-the-sholder at Trooping EVER, but suddenly it turns out that it was okay all along? Pffft.

And now Sam Cohen is okaying her clothes? In what universe? It’s been clear form the very beginning (starting with the photocall facial drama) that these two do whatever they want and no one says boo to them. The clothes are being picked in Soho House with Jess. Sam gets to see it when Meghan shows up in it. She’s not vetting anything.

Hell, even Givenchy is going “we had eight fittings and this is what she wanted because she’s a strong personality and she knows what she wants.” They couldn’t get a waist tucked in and their fashion reputation was on the line. Do you really think Sam gets to veto necklines? Sam is lucky she got a backup job after quitting BP in a huff. She’s not saying shit.

Meghan is trying to pull off sexy rebel – doing things right on the surface but with what she imagines are small adjustments that pull focus to her. The kind of focus that is “She’s so inappropriate!” but to her = sexy. Problem is she just looks tacky and weird, not sexy. We can see her sexing things up, but she’s not achieving actual sexy.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

I can see this, but you don’t want to bring “sexy” into the royal sphere. It just looks tacky.

Also, Lainey is at it again course-correcting for Rachel. Have you noticed her constantly using the prefix “Royal” now anytime she mentions Rachel? I don’t see her doing that with any of the other actual Royals. I wonder though, how do Lainey and her Toronto based peers seriously address Rachel as HRH. I mean, this chic is basic AF for the rest of us.. imagine knowing her from back in the day? How do you reconcile that? 1/2

anonymoushouseplantfan:

2/2 – Do you listen to Lainey’s podcasts? Her co-podcast producer mentioned that they used to do a lot of fashion/entertainment/regional hotspot segments with local based celebrities. Apparently there is a LOT of b-roll sitting around Toronto with Rachel fake-lifestyle guruing. The producer mentioned she though Rachel was basic AF, and it was jarring to have one of their own (or someone even lower than them on the thirsty-social TO totem pole) in the BRF.


Thanks, I don’t listen to the podcast, so this is interesting.

Yup. It was on the “Sasha Answers” podcast after the wedding:

They discuss Megs and the wedding for the first 17 and a half minutes. Sasha openly says that Megs did NOT come across as completely genuine during the wedding. 

They also discuss Meg’s fashion disaster from her first outing as a royal.

I think Lainey actually even says during the podcast that she’s not sure she’s ever liked Meghan’s style. 

You know, things Lainey will say talking on a podcast that she won’t put in writing for her readers…