Submitted:

anonymoushouseplantfan:

For the Brit brands: they are not used to give it to the royals for free. It’s just not done like that. Of course, Sarah Burton might give Kate a huge discount when she orders 5 coat-dressed from the same pattern but in 5 slighly different shades of pastel. But look at that from the perspective that at these numbers it’s no longer a bespoken, it’s a mass production! And Erdem might give Kate a wholesale discount for buying a whole line of curtain dresses in one day.  I mean, they have to encourage their loyal customers.  But absolutely free?  Nope, still not done for the royals. As for Meghans: she does not have budget left.  Whatever PC gave her, she blew it up already.  So Canadian and US freebies it is.  Whatever JM can find. 


Thanks for sending this in! I think she still has a Stella tux somewhere (at leas according to one of the leaks), but, in general, I suspect you’re right.

keepingupwiththebananadrama:

The only logical explanation I see for Rachel and her style choices is that she suffers from Achromatopsia, and a lot of people trolling her by lying about the color in front of her. So from here on out when I post pics of Rachel they will be in black/white/gray.

Notice how her dress and Harry’s tie match and the dark blue clutch is a great contrast.

Maybe British brands know the merching rules and don’t offer her freebies. And she doesn’t have the cash to command a solid, continuous relationship with them like Jenny Packham and Kate. I suspect this is why we’ve never seen her with a lot of British brands, esp given how it was an easy “win” to ingratiate herself and chameleon herself as is her MO; they just didn’t bite and she simply can’t afford to. It’s proof that everything she has despite her “millions” is funneled freebies from Jess M.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

That is a very strong probability. 

Submitted: Cost of Wellchild outfit

anonymoushouseplantfan:

https://www.independent.ie/style/voices/caitlin-mcbride-meghan-markles-5000-outfit-at-a-childrens-charity-event-reeks-of-bad-taste-37284699.html

The Altazurra trouser suit, €1,650, the Falabella Stella McCartney clutch, €425, the black suede Aquzurra pumps, €220, a €325 camisole by Deitas and a pair of pearl earrings gifted to her by Queen Elizabeth (price unknown, but worth at least €2,000) does not exactly exude a ‘princess of the people’ image 


Thanks for sending this in! The ironic part is that they are complaining about a 5k outfit, which is on THE LOW END for Meghan. I didn’t even bitch about the cost of that outfit because Meghan’s average outfit cost is now somewhere near the five figures.

I suspect the straw that broke the camel’s back was that it was a 5k plain black pantsuit and it’s the fourth thousand-dollar black pantsuit she owns.

So MM is a hit and mostly misses w/ her wardrobe. It’s mind baffling on exactly why…I’ve come to the conclusion that she lacks conviction. If she was someone who knew who she was she would morph into her “Royal” version whilst keeping her personality. Others did the same Sophie, even Camilla, (I’m going w/ older generation, Kate and Diana weren’t even in there 30’s) She’s in her late 30’s but she dressed like she was in her early 20’s LA chic. It doesn’t translate well into modest royalty 🙄

Nope. Can’t say I’m surprised though. If someone offers her something really expensive to wear, she’ll clearly wear it even if it doesn’t fit well and isn’t suitable for the occasion.

image

Harper’s bazaar ”How Meghan Markle’s First 100 Days as a Royal Compare to Kate Middleton’s”..”The First Event Post-Wedding”,the nude Reiss dress that Kate used to meet the Obama’s at BP was incredibly successful and seeing photos side by side of MM vs Kate,Kate is effortlessly elegant and MM just a mess

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Oh, wow. This is a fantastic slide show.

https://www.harpersbazaar.com/celebrity/latest/g22854790/meghan-markle-kate-middleton-royal-first-100-days/

Hi! fashion anon here- besides the family drama MM has a ton of press out there fishing for sponsors for her clothes. The stories comparing her to Kate the ” she dressed to compliment Kate” etc are all fishing and the “everything Meghan wore since the wedding” stuff is too. So she needs her fall wardrobe and it is not getting sent to her – she needs to advertise. She is also getting a lot of the brands the lifestyle bloggers get sent to them too.

Sorry for the late reply. Been on vacay.

I’ve noticed all the articles. It almost seems like overkill in some places.

Wonder if after all the crap that happens in August will permanently kill her chances with fashion designers. Guess we’ll see…

image

royal-confessions:

“Dior, Givenchy (doesn’t matter if the designer is British – it’s still a French brand), Ralph Lauren and Roland Mouret…not even a year as a British royal and Meghan has probably worn more non-British brands than Kate ever did in two years. It’s funny how people would rip Kate apart when she dared wear foreign brands once even when she wears a lot of British fashion but now people are quiet when Meghan does it even more than her.“ – Submitted by Anonymous

PLATELL’S PEOPLE: Why Kate needs a word with Meghan

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Most probably other anons have already sent you this, but I find it remarkable, as “shameless extravagance” is quite a strong wording, spot on but very strong for British usual politeness.

“One final piece of advice. Perhaps Meghan should book an appointment with Rigby & Peller, providers of lingerie to the royals — and get herself a proper-fitting bra.” nipple-gate has indeed reached the news.


It’s a ton of money! That’s why they are using strong language. What they don’t say is that they’ve been bitching about the cost of Kate’s clothing for years.

But they did mention Megs spent more than Kate’s first year married to William.

PLATELL’S PEOPLE: Why Kate needs a word with Meghan

OMG, actually gasped aloud when I read that THAT standard, vacay oversized shirt cost £600! £600 = $800! ON WHAT PLANET MEGHAN????????? I don’t have enough questionmarks for this. I don’t. I’ve got an identical one from H&M for £17 in their “premium cotton”. And it looks better. Like wth? But Meghan: you’re doing great, keep burning that dosh. Do you need an industrial digging machine for that hole you’re digging for yourself? I’m sure we could sort a merching or loan contract out for you.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

She just keeps on digging. It’s amazing.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

“Meghan, in her Givenchy trouser suit, at the Famine Memorial” –  that’s golden!  I hope this description sticks around. And every time  Irish visit is mentioned MM to be known as “in her Givenchy trouser suit, at the Famine Memorial”.  Like Kate is still being dragged for pink coat on Ground Zero memorial (funny side note – Camilla wore a pink suit to Ground Zero in 2005, guess that’s where Kate got the idea https://www.cbsnews.com/pictures/royal-visit-ground-zero/ and absolutely noone cared or felt insulted by this shade of pink). 

But what I find absolutely mind-blowing is Dior at RAF100. That’s just such a huge faux-pas. I’m not taking about the dress itself or black colour, overall MM looked fine.  But absolutely inappropriate. First, This sort of services in the bound-duty of BRF. They all wear uniforms to show their ranks. Men wear literally uniforms, royal ladies wear their most distinct uniform like outfit. It’s not by chance that after RAF100 everyone is talking that Kate has settled into uniform. Yes, she did and yes that’s how it should be. And then there is MM with hollywood glamoure in haut couture black dress.  Second, the price.  We don’t have so far the numbers, but I really hope that roaly reporters and bloggers pest Dior for the quotes on such bespoken.  My guess: the costs of the dress will easily surpass the combine costs of royal ladies outfits. That’s the Queen, 2 future Queens, Princess Royal, Countess Wessex.  What sort of arrogance MM must have to think that she’s worthy of that much! This brings to the third point, who paid for it? MM sugars are screaming that she has millions of her own.  Please! Total BS. Not even gonna entertain this notion. If Charles’ credit card pays for it, then why he allows such extravaganza? Personally, I don’t think Charles would approve the bills like that. My guess is that he gave them a budget, they have already blew it  long time ago. And this Dior is a freebie. Which is even less acceptable than millions spent on clothes. 

Oh I hope the reporters will spin and spin and spin the reciepts.  And when push comes to shove how Charles will play it out?  What is worse for him? Acknowledge freebies which opens doors so many other freebies probes? Or let total sum of MM clothes+jewels be attributed to his allowance and basically label MM a gold-digger?


Thanks for sending this in! I’m very curious about how much that Dior cost.

Submitted:

anonymoushouseplantfan:

“I’d say the right comparison is Kate’s first year, not this year. ” – Heck, they may as well compare to the total of all Kate’s 7 years. The end result might be either “almost the same” or even “slightly over”.  Just a fast google search, all numbers are from  tabs articls in thousands  £

2017-119K,

https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/style/896006/kate-middleton-pictures-news-latest-clothes-wardrobe-cost

2016 -174K,

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-4048352/How-Kate-sported-designer-clothes-worth-170-000-year.html

2015-43K –  the same article as about 2016

2014- could not find

2013 – could not find

June-Dec 2012 – could not find

May 2011-June 2012-105K

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2165211/Kate-Middletons-105k-wardrobe-Duchess-Cambridge-worth-penny-says-LIZ-JONES.html

I think May2011-Dec2011 was about 55K, but can’t find an article.

What we have so far ca. 500K. The missing 2 years and a half could be max 200K. Her totals for 7 years will be ca. 700K.

I’m afraid MM has already spent that. And wait till the end of the year. 


Thanks for sending this in. I can’t find those years either. Funny because I could have sworn that they did this every single year. BTW, Kate’s entire Australia tour was 55k and I think they were counting repeats. 

https://www.express.co.uk/life-style/style/472363/Kate-Middleton-spends-55-000-on-her-wardrobe-for-royal-tour-of-Australia-and-New-Zealand

IMO Meghan looked overdressed on pitch and hairstyle worn with that Givenchy suit was a miss, almost like rain caught her on her way. Clutch was completely unnecessary but she has to show she’s recycling. I presume stilettos are to prevent from taking part in any activity, she’s also worn stilettos on Invictus Trials back in March or April

I suspect she wore stilettos in this instance for two reasons

  1. Merching
  2. She’s really short and doesn’t want to look even shorter next to Harry in flats.
image

She probably would have been shorter than this field hockey player had she not worn heels. 

Fashion anon back – same guy owns Givenchy and Dior and those houses are very controlling won’t give you their stuff unless the also supply the hairdresser makeup so you look good. That explains her transformation – she has a Dior/Givenchy supplied hairdresser. I am surprised she was a fail just two weeks ago but the Givenchy connection made at the wedding must have paid off. That wedding was a merch fest and advertisement rolled up in one. And it worked. Pt 1

Pt 2 She is now emphasizing her breasts (padded bra for sure) tight around the torso. Sex pot Meghan. Stuff she is now wearing suits her shape much better. But can she sustain this – she needs to give them a lot of press to justify the costs. And her inability to walk is still a problem. Harry is conspicuously looking at her feet all the time fear of her falling out of the shoes. Express even had an article about her inability to walk. She needs to get shoes she can walk in.




Express had an article on her wobbling on the cobble: https://www.express.co.uk/news/royal/987065/meghan-markle-prince-harry-ireland-dublin-pictures-news-dress

I prefer a padded bra to seeing her nipples when she’s braless. Small mercies. 

But this Roland Mouret dress doesn’t exactly look like it fits on top. It’s not smooth on top, kind of wrinkled. Looks like it needs to be pulled down or adjusted in some places. The color on her doesn’t help either. Kind of a washout.

image

And this suit looks pretty basic on her. I don’t understand how Givenchy justifies giving her this. It doesn’t look like a couture house suit with that scoop neck, at least to me.

image

Why the pumps on an athletic field? I will never understand this. 

The whole French couture thing is EXACTLY what Fergie did. Diana always supported British designers so F said she turned to French designers to avoid the comparison. Except she ran up massive debts doing it. Most of it was super dreadful 80’s ugliness. History really is repeating itself. Except now, she’s either merching or wasting PC’s money.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

And she also wore Marks and Spencer!

http://articles.latimes.com/1988-03-04/news/vw-428_1_fergie-fashion

Submitted:

anonymoushouseplantfan:

this BBC  documentary is on royal fashion it’s surely not definitive but is interesting.  One of the points made here is that a royal should be concerned with what their clothes communicate but not concerned with what is fashionable.  The most fashionable royals were the least popular.  Fratelli Prada who is surely the last word on the matter of fashion has said that Queen Elizabeth is the “most elegant woman on the planet”.  Yet Elizabeth eschews the “fashionable”.  That strikes me as being quite insightful

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DZDvS2o5Pdw


Thanks for sending this in! Very good documentary.

I think “Fruity dress” or “Fruit salad dress” would be a more open option for the bingo. Because she’ll probably keep going for the rotting fruity pastel shades now that she’s trying to project her suits-script onto her royal script. A Fruity dress encompasses anything from banana, snotty passion fruit, watermelon, overripe half-squashed pastel strawberries, maybe we’ll even be graced with a watery lettuce salad dress – which would technically fit the “salad”-part. :) /Optimist anon

anonymoushouseplantfan:

We had an anon last week who said she would probably switch to bright colors now because Season 1 was Meghan being super serious and trying to do a good job in black, Season 2 was Meghan being “in love” and trying to fit in in pink, and now Season 3 is Meghan breaking out the bright colors because now she is confident and a seasoned royal. I suspect that anon is right.

Submitted: Krazy Kaiser

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Hi Plant! I imagined you saw CB’s post about Markle’s expensive clothing, and OF COURSE, Kaiser blamed all the criticizing about her crazy expending on racism! (And, of course, she threw Kate under the bus, as always!) I’m so tired of this delusional, faux feminist bitch and her fake outrage about everything, she’s gotten so delusional that even the majority of the people in the comments were disagreeing with her. They were saying that they didn’t criticized her because of her race but because that money was coming out of the British people’s pockets and that England wasn’t stable enough right now to be expending money on some z-lister’s I’ll fitting clothes, which it shocked me, since Kaiser only accepts comments that agree with her point of view. Honestly, the first time I saw Markle I thought she was white, it never crossed my mind that she was biracial, much less black (which she isn’t) I’m honestly so over people blaming everything on racism, sexism or whining about something as stupid as ‘micro aggressions’ (which by the way, WTF is that??) sometimes you just criticize someone because you can see right through their bullshit, thirstiness and fakeness. Just like most people do with Markle.


Thanks for sending this in. I lol’d at the racism charge. Seriously? Kate faced this exact same criticism for a much smaller bill. Mary and Letizia get criticized every year. Sofia was lambasted last year and she spent like forty thousand euros or something like that–that covers maybe two of Meghan’s outfits. How is it racist to maybe start thinking that Meghan is spending too much when she’s hit the seven figures in six months? At the rate she’s going Meghan will have spent more in one year than Kate spend in her entire Duchess life. Heck, she may spend more than ALL the royal ladies together spent in 2017.

http://ufonomore.com/blog/2018/1/1/2017-costs

Celebitchy has an article on M today. She’s making excuses for the cost of her clothes.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

LOL, it’s “racist” to think that it’s too much money. And they bring up Kate’s clothes too. Dude, THE WHOLE POINT is that Meghan is spending ten times Kate’s yearly budged in six months, THAT’S THE WHOLE POINT.

Kate was famously wearing Reiss during her first year–heck, she recycled her engagement dress during the Canada tour–and she was STILL criticized for spending too much money. Kate was absolutely dragged for that 50k bill and it was a small fraction of what Meghan has spent. 

And let’s not even mention that Meghan looks like absolute crap in her expensive couture. Her best looks so far have been the Halo dress, the blue off-the-rack Roland Mouret, and the black capris at polo this weekend. According to Katie Nicholls, Megs is now in the market for a stylist. That means she knows she’s royally fucking up. LOL, this is now the fifth person they’ve brought in to help. 

https://www.celebitchy.com/583255/does_duchess_meghan_need_the_couture_clothes_to_accentuate_her_new_power/

Fashion roadkill – that is brilliant. And yeah that article is a throw MM under the bus but also a call for more “youthful” designers to send her their stuff and pay her to wear it. At 37 she is a tad pushing the “youthful” vibe. But hey since the classic Audrey Hepburn look did not work for her she’ll try something else. So we saw her in a more “youthful” pair of capri’s from the 90’s today at day 2 of polo. You know any 20 somethings who wear capri’s? I don’t. PT 1

Pt 2 But the real problem is not just her fashion roadkill look it is her numbers. They are non existent – she is not catching the public’s interest. Can’t cure that either. The other problem is the extravagant wardrobe pr that is now everywhere – no designer wants to be associated with a controversial figure and MM’s extravagant ways is controversy not to mention the threat of “revelations” that is rumored to be happening soon. She could become untouchable.




Well, “fashion roadkill” actually comes from an episode of Sex and the City, so I can’t take credit for it. It seems completely appropriate in this situation though. 

image

I know people keep on saying capris for the pants, but I always think of capris being a little loose and not completely body hugging. What she’s wearing just looks like tight jeans that are too short. Maybe it looks better close up, but I doubt it. 

I’m curious to see what she wears on Thursday though. It’s make or break for her in the fashion realm these next several days. I would bet that she’s about to become untouchable after this next month, but we’ll see.

image

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Wow, amazing E! video on Meghan’s wardrobe. Melanie Bromley calls it “extreme” and her co-host says “but she was supposed to be the relatable one…she duped us.”

I had a ton of anons asking me if I would stop blogging after the wedding. THIS is why I didn’t stop blogging. This is the best part, people figuring out that it was all fake pr.

Meghan Markle has gone from chic to a fashion disaster

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Jess is now throwing Meghan under the bus. It’s every man for himself now, I guess.

This article is one part throwing Jess Mulroney under the bus, one part merching preview, and one part mea culpa on Meg’s fashion disasters.

Her engagements in the next few weeks are probably still make-or-break for her in the fashion world. No designer wants their pieces looking like fashion roadkill over the next five months.

Meghan Markle has gone from chic to a fashion disaster

Straight from the horses month “meghan markle chats to glamour about vb dresses, her personal style and her fashion cringe moments”. Make what you will of it but this gives context and foshadows her currently “style”. My take away is that she knows exactly what she is doing.. Why arn’t people looking into this? This is insane.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

http://www.glamourmagazine.co.uk/gallery/meghan-markle-interview-about-suits-the-outnet-and-her-love-of-clothes

Thanks for the Throwback Saturday, anon. That interview is so bizarre in retrospect. It really illustrates how Meghan SAYS all the right things, but then she doesn’t execute AT ALL.

Here she is on what she supposedly learned from the Suits wardrobe department.

That lesson didn’t stick at all. She clearly does not know what looks good on her figure.

Here she is on recycling and mixing and matching:

Another one that didn’t stick at all as we’ve had expensive new pieces on pretty much every single outing.

Here she is talking about craftsmanship:

This is the most ironic statement EVER. The “work” has spoken for itself in the past couple of months and what it has said is not nice.

Oh, and this is why she moved from blacks to pinks:

That’s why she went from blacks to pinks. She was re-enacting her Rachel Zane plot line. If only she’d re-enacted the wardrobe too.

Fashion anon – she has little to attract them – she will wear something as a come on – see me and the coverage you could get if you pay me to wear it again. The articles in BBC WWD and WSJ about how much she can sell when she wears something are fishing expeditions for more sponsors. Her pr sends out emails to o push coverage so she gets lots of exposure which will attract the sponsors. Do a search for MM Givenchy and see how many places her pic shows up in. Pt 1

Pt 2 ultimately though she can’t maintain public interest – brands look at the numbers and hers suck. She cannot sustain interest especially without Harry. And she does not show clothes well. Too short can’t walk in stilettos and the makeup and mistakes generate too many negatives. Notice Prada did not feature her on their IG when she wore that Prada. She tries but she really is just a zlist celeb. Givenchy took her pic off their IG when she wore the wallpaper dress. But her reps keep try




This is what I got when I did the MM + Givenchy search:

image
image

Some are clearly referencing other previous Givenchy outings, but I totally agree with you. It’s really nice to hear someone confirm what others have been thinking. I’ve seen some of the same thinking over at @anonymoushouseplantfan. First Oscar de la Renta blocked comments on MM’s picture, and then they took down her picture completely

I suspect MM’s engagement on July 5th, and her engagements from July 9 through 11th are make-or-break for her on the fashion front. If she can’t look great, then I doubt she’s going to get anything else after. It’s becoming obvious to too many people that she’s a dud.

By the way, looks like Oscar de la Renta still has some anti-MM comments on that dress (with the model) photo

image

Guess since it’s no longer recent that they don’t care as much about it.

Thanks fashion anon!

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Hello dear Plant I’m sorry I don’t know how to send multiple pics, I did a research from Italy (there are some privacy laws that modify the Google search so it might be different from the States) of Vogue Paris and Meghan and you can see every time there is a press release it’s stated on the result. So it was very interesting. A lot of press releases about fashion brands, jewelry, makeup. I’ve researched also Kate on Vogue Paris and I found only one press release about her, that was the article of her and Char coordinating outfits. I will send you other pics next so you can see but you can probably do it better. 


Thanks for sending these in! I think many of these are press releases from the brands themselves, but the Diana and “psychological pink” ones are coming from Meghan. They don’t really support any brand. But one reason why we are seeing so much Meghan coverage is that all her brands are sending press releases. In this pic alone we have shoe, beauty and clothing brands e-mailing stuff.

Kate does do press releases, but they are usually about family or work stuff. Also, she usually wears established UK brands that don’t scorch the earth like this.

But it’s interesting to see how it works. Thanks for sending this!

Who’s that girl? << The Madonna of the Palace

anonymoushouseplantfan:

anonymoushouseplantfan:

We reported a few weeks ago that some of the more old school members of the Royal household didn’t know what to make of the new Duchess of Sussex, so invented the nickname “Meghan The Menace”.

Their eyebrows have been raised further with Ms Markle’s choice of personal aide. Not a tried and trusted Royal adviser or an experienced aristo to help her navigate the choppy waters of royal etiquette, but someone from the celebrity world, whose biggest previous job was working for Madonna.

Buckingham Palace staff are already dining out on a tale of how Meghan’s new girl was calling up big brands and asking for freebies, as if her boss was in the cast of Love Island rather than married to the Queen’s grandson.

From this week’s Popitch


Whoa! Thank you so much for sending this in.

Here’s the “few weeks ago” item, in case anyone is interested:

Did you get that DM article about why M wears pink? One of the reasons is that it sub-consciously shows how happy she is and how IN LOVE she is with PH. Yeah, right.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

anonymoushouseplantfan:

I love this. So they are saying she wasn’t “in love” until she got the title?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-5891783/Why-Meghan-Markle-wears-pink-royal.html

Ha! Vogue Paris let the cat out of the bag. The pink articles are a press release.

Fashion anon here again – she is working for luxury brand sponsors and working ti hard. Note her pr and its orientation. So to me that signals she knows her days are numbered and she needs a settled financial situation. She isn’t getting any big settlement from him. So October looks good to me. She knows too the media are coming. She hasn’t much time.

This might be one of the best things I’ve read this morning. (Sorry, I have a couple stressful days ahead.) 

But what you’re saying explains a lot of things. She’s still merching. I just CANNOT understand what any luxury brand sees in her though. I mean, do you know? She looks terrible in all of her recent outfits. Like that blue disaster she wore to the Spencer wedding…😳

But you’re definitely right in that she doesn’t have much time. She probably has two weeks–MAYBE three weeks max–as I see it before things get even crazier. 

The summer of fire is here, and July ain’t going to be pretty for a lot of people (and much of August too). Like, if you’re in the US and live in an area that could be hit by a hurricane, start preparing now. If you know people who are having tough emotional times, keep in contact with them and let them you know you care and that they’re not alone. 

Shit is already crazy, and I guarantee you it’s going to get even crazier. 

image

VANITY FAIR: “What It Costs to Dress Like Meghan Markle: An Investigation” … Another CYA article stressing that, according to TV-fashion expert Mark Heyes, “it’s quite important for the Duchess of Sussex to be wearing couture especially at this point in her life. This is all brand new and the eyes of the world are on her. Couture will have been specifically made for her so she’s going to look a million dollars.” Yeah. OK.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

They used the same rationale for Kate’s expenses, but this is about 10 times what Kate spent. Kate is the future Queen. There is no reason why Meghan should be spending hundreds of thousands of dollars more than Kate.

work in fashion and I tell you factually she is doing paid product placement – Givenchy and Birks at the least probably more. In the industry it is known she has been searching for a sponsor for awhile now and she got Givenchy. That is weird for a royal. She is going to bail. Piers M knows all and will spill some is also the rumor.

Interesting. I suspected as much with her crappy sample looks. 

I expect Fleet Street–and I’m including Piers as part of that–to dump a LOT on her this summer. There is no reason for them to wait. She’s done all the possible big stuff, and the press will need something to publish this summer.

If she could have learned to keep her mouth shut and stop baiting the press for good coverage every two seconds, she might have had more of a chance. But since she doesn’t know how to live without constant press coverage, well, constant press coverage will be what she gets.

image

identifying designers

honeyfaun:

Ellie Saab

Known for: lace, gems, crystals, pearls, detailed embroidery

image

Zuhair Murad

Known for: formal, flower, detailed

image

Dolce & Gabbana

Known for: elaborate prints, heavy embroidery, lace, and flowers

image

Givenchy

Known for: out-of-the-box but still showing elegance and luxury

image

Versace

Known for: flashy prints and bright colors

image

Alexander McQueen

Known for: dark colors, thick fabrics, animal motifs, and uniform and culturally inspired pieces

image

Christian Dior

Known for: costume deigns, head fabrics, and decorated jewels

image

Prada

Known for: bold and daring outfits even for daily wear

image

Betsey Johnson

Known for: wild, decorated, colorful, bold, and bright kitsch designs 

image

Kate Spade

Known for: colorful, stylish, upbeat, and practical women’s clothes

image

Chanel

Known for: timeless and elegant suits and cocktail dresses and pastel-colored business casual

Karl Lagerfeld

Known for: bold elegance

Michael Kors

Known for: sportswear, luxury wear, boutique dresses, and accessories

Marc Jacobs

Known for: wild designs, bold colors, large patterns, dar and bright colors paired

antiquehistoryliterature:

HRH The Duchess of Cambridge’s Wedding Dress and accesories

Designed by Sarah Burton for Alexander McQueen, the wedding dress (The ivory gown of white satin gazar with overall lace applique work with floral detail, the full skirt with box pleats, the back leading to a 9ft train. The lace bodice with V-neck line and long sleeves. The lace detail incorporating the rose, thistle, daffodil and shamrock) is on display alongside the magnificent Cartier ‘Halo’ tiara (A diamond ‘halo’ tiara formed as a band of 16 graduated scrolls, set with 739 brilliants and 149 baton diamonds, each scroll divided by a graduated brilliant and with a large brilliant at the centre; original red leather box, with later Garrards label.) lent by The Queen to The Duchess on her wedding day; The Duchess’s wedding shoes, hand-made by the team at Alexander McQueen (ivory shoes with lace embroidery); the diamond earrings commissioned by the Middleton family as a personal gift to the bride from her parents; a replica of the bridal bouquet(A wedding bouquet of lilly of the valley, hyacinth, sweet william, myrtle and ivory) and a veil made of layers of ivory silk-tulle with a trim of hand-embroidered flowers.

mckittenkat:

Can we talk about Leslie Jones in the front row at Christian Siriano’s show for New York Fashion Week?

For anyone who may have forgotten, Leslie Jones met Siriano when he volunteered over twitter to dress her for the Ghostbusters 2016 premiere when she was struggling to find a dress as no designer had offered to work with her. This was also amid Leslie’s twitter harassment issues.

Siriano’s show included women of all sizes & skin tones as well as Avie Acosta, who is trans woman and the first trans person in any of Siriano’s NY fashion week shows. As well as being inclusive of gender identity, Siriano included two gender non conforming androgynous male models in the show.

Leslie has said of Siriano that “he’s so normal, he’s so down to earth, and he does love all women. That’s what I love about him. He loves all women.”

So in the words of Siriano himself, “people are people,” & “we all grow in the same garden.”