She’s not pregnant, the pleats start at the neckline and finish at the rib cage, this making her boobs look huge. Then they start again at her abdomen, if she was pregnant, she dress wouldn’t be flat at her stomach. Also the way she’s standing does not help also, she is pushing shoulders back and hip forward… she definitely wanted baby rumors to start today.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Yep.

It would be nice if anyone suddenly thinking she’s pregnant would stop and realize that she looked like her super thin self just a week ago at the Hamilton event. That was eight days ago.

Can you imagine spending your life thinking ‘If I had all of the money in the world and a ton of events to go to I would look amazing and be adored all the time’ (because you know that was what MM was thinking during her years in the periphery of HW) and then actually getting all of that and looking like a perpetual fashion victim? The irony is delicious, it really is. Also, has anything ever better illustrated that money can’t buy you class or taste?

anonymoushouseplantfan:

I suspect part of the problem is that she thinks she thinks of herself as a designer who had her own clothing line. She thinks she knows better, so she doesn’t listen to the people advising her.

So sick of the hand holding. If you were at a regular place of business and you were married to someone you worked with would you walk around the office holding hands like this? No. This is how teenagers hold hands walking through the halls of their highschool. They look like immature morons trying to prove they’re so in love they must be connected physically at all times. Enough! At this point their only trying to prove it to themselves because no one else is buying what their trying to sell.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

They probably think it’s the most romantic thing ever, but it just looks unprofessional.

Submitted:

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Meghan looks somehow tranquilized and wired at the same time. Talk about magic.


She’s zoned out and trying to compensate for it. I wonder why she hit the Xanax this time. Are we getting another daddy interview this weekend?

Probably. Didn’t he give a 9-hour interview to the Daily Mail back in early August? And they probably haven’t published everything he told them as of yet.

The tentacle hands are probably Harry’s idea, so yeah he’d have no trouble agreeing to it. Like other anons said, he wanted an actress, someone to play the media game with him. He’s not a victim whose been tricked into this marriage, he chased actresses like Jennifer Lawrence, offering private tours of palaces and obviously flying them to Africa. I don’t doubt he gave other girls security guards as a way to appear manly and powerful. I doubt MM was the 1st who got this, just the 1st we’ve heard

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Very likely.

sweetenergrandes:

“When the [Wonder Woman] TV show came out, I was twelve years old, and I just never seen anything like it in my life. I mean, soon as the going got tough, you saw this woman who was seemingly demure and sweet and beautiful and all of that. [Diana] could transform into this superhero and just get the job done. It wasn’t about her trading in her femininity or her intelligence. She wasn’t vindictive towards other women. She was just her. And the lasso, and the bulletproof bracelets

― I mean, that sort of superhuman power associated with being a girl… I’ve never seen anything like it. I’m still a twelve-year-old girl. I try to talk her off the ledge every once in a while, but I’m still a twelve-year-old girl.” ― Viola Davis on her obsession with Wonder Woman

Guys, Harry can’t ring up MI5 and ask them to play bodyguard to his girlfriend. I doubt Charles can either. This is MI5, the equivalent to the FBI. Just take a moment and think this through. The most likely scenario is that the bodyguard was RPO while Harry was there, and the Canadian cops when he wasn’t. Let’s not put it past Wendell to exaggerate the story to make it look juicy. He is an actor after all, trying to promote his show.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

I doubt it was Canadian cops. Wendell can tell a Canadian from a Brit.

Even if it was an RPO, it still means someone from the UK was shelling out money for Megsy to have that level of security, which she certainly did not merit.

KP alibi will be the security is “paid privately ” . It’s always like that. I don’t know for how long the BRF will do cover up for Harry and Meghan.Harry need to be spank hard hoping he will wake up that “not everything he wishes will be granted”

anonymoushouseplantfan:

They’ll likely try that, but is it believable?  I mean, look at the big picture. He flew an actress he’d just met to Botswana on a work trip, then he gave her royal security, then he flew to see her after an official tour, all in the space of a few months. He got away with A LOT. 

I’m beginning to wonder if this article will end up opening the door to more articles in Fleet Street exposing money shenanigans, particularly those by Megs and Harry. 

I don’t believe the Wendell MI5 story one bit. First, MI5 is for domestic counter intelligence & security. Why would they cover an American in Canada? They don’t even cover the royals in the UK! It’s like saying the FBI were protecting Harry in the UK. Wrong arm of security. Second, i can’t imagine Charles agreeing to pay for this. She probably had regular body guards like it was reported back then. This is Rachel. She likes security stories to make herself seem important.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Maybe, but I don’t think Wendell would mistake UK secret agents for Canadian private security. He’s an actor. He’s used to having security around.

Cui bono? That is, who benefits? Megsy does NOT benefit from this story. 

1) With all her clothes spending, she does not need stories circulating that she got more protection than Kate before Kate became engaged to William. And for an ENTIRE YEAR!

2) Megsy clearly cut Wendell off since he wasn’t at the wedding. More likely, he figures he has nothing to lose in telling stories about her when he worked with her on Suits. And he’s right, he doesn’t really have anything to lose. 

It’s not coincidence Wendell Pierce didn’t go to the wedding and now he’s spilling the tea. I suspect KP will issue a swift complaint to IPSO and the British press won’t pick up that article. But I’d LOVE IT if the daily mail did 😆

anonymoushouseplantfan:

I don’t see how they can bury it. It’s apparently an interview he did for Extra so there must be video out there somewhere. You don’t get more legitimate than first person recollection caught on video for a different publisher.

And what are they going to say? That they paid privately for Mi5 to follow Meghan around? Is that even possible? That a US actor mistook private security for Mi5? That’s pretty ridiculous.

Given the timing of this story, I’m beginning to wonder if anything else is just going to fall out of the cracks in the next two weeks. 

I’m just waiting on who run with this story first the Sun and DM. Fingers crossed for them to contact BP and CH for a comment and/or confirm tax payer money being used. 😂😂😂 I don’t think they will/should bother with KP, that office has been caught in too many lies already.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

I’m very curious to see who pounces on this and whether they let KP brush them off with a haughty non-denial. This is potentially a big deal. There’s no “they might have been engaged” here.

Well, maybe it was just a drop in the bucket compared to all the cash they’re letting her spend on her clothes… 

Even still, this girl racks up QUITE the expense bill!

Wow meghan got an MI5 agent every day in Canada for a year meanwhile kate was repeatedly harassed by a hoard of paparazzi on a daily basis for 10 years. Not to mention a misuse of taxpayers funds. I also find it funny that the chick was so scared in Canada but it didn’t deter her away settling down with the prince.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

LOL, and I was bitching about a couple of hours at Invictus. This would be hundreds of thousands in taxpayer money. There were rumors that Doria had RPOs in LA too. I wonder if those were true too. 

Yup. This chick gets whatever she wants and still complains. Nothing is good enough for her. Meanwhile, Kate really did suffer harassment for years.

Meghan Markle Had a British Secret Service Agent With Her on ‘Suits’ Set

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Every day since the day the relationship was announced? Reeeeeaaaaaalllllyyyyyyy? This isn’t an anonymous source. This is an eyewitness from the show putting his name on it. I wonder if anyone will comment.

When you think about all the harassment Kate received from the paparazzi, this is really ridiculous. 

Meghan Markle Had a British Secret Service Agent With Her on ‘Suits’ Set

Meghan Markle Had a British Secret Service Agent With Her on ‘Suits’ Set

keepingupwiththebananadrama:

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Every day since the day the relationship was announced? Reeeeeaaaaaalllllyyyyyyy? This isn’t an anonymous source. This is an eyewitness from the show putting his name on it. I wonder if anyone will comment.

Ah yes they leaked their own relationship and need MI5 protection. I’m not surprised by the abuse of power.

“As soon as it came out that they were dating, everyone was warned to stop talking or they would be fired”

I don’t find it a coincidence that Wendell didn’t attend the wedding and is now spitting out these details…

Screen shots of this article in case it disappears…

Meghan Markle Had a British Secret Service Agent With Her on ‘Suits’ Set

newshour:

There’s no place like home for a pair of ruby slippers used in “The Wizard of Oz,” recovered in an FBI sting last month 13 years after they were stolen from a Minnesota museum. The FBI said in a news release yesterday that the shoes were among several pairs of the ruby red slippers worn by actress Judy Garland in her iconic portrayal of Dorothy Gale. This particular pair was insured for $1 million and investigators offered a $250,000 reward for its return. #wizardofoz
https://www.instagram.com/p/BnWlatjHH-S/?utm_source=ig_tumblr_share&igshid=vcy6xtreqrfk

Most people carry that pain around inside them their whole lives, until they kill the pain by other means, or until it kills them. But you, my friends, you found another way: a way to use the pain. To burn it as fuel, for light and warmth. You have learned to break the world that has tried to break you.

Lev Grossman (via quotemadness)

Submitted: Parenting styles

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Hi plant, the issue of Kate working vs. not and the perceived resentment it brings up is interesting. I’m 32 so squarely in the “old millennial” segment. I’m also a career woman with a MBA living in a high COL coastal city and most of my friends are also high-earning professionals as well. The trend of being very hands-on, even stay-at-home parenting is the ultimate status symbol in my cohort and I’ve known a lot of women who’ve made the conscious decision to leave or significantly dial back their high powered careers for stay at home parenting, at least while the kids are young. Now, a lot of it is an issue of numbers – in the US work life balance is notoriously poor (finance and law regularly requires 90 hr weeks, and that’s if your privelidged; otherwise you’re pulling in 4 fast food shifts just to make ends meet) and child care is prohibitively expensive. But even without those considerations, people in my set love to be “crunchy” in certain ways – organic farmer’s markets, home cooking, going to therapy, etc. I believe it has to do with a very specific generational backlash – from being raised in an era when divorce rates were at its peak, when postpartum depression wasn’t spoken of and parents just drank too much or popped Valium, when very lax parenting and TV dinners were acceptable to kids. So my generation wants to, and understands, the desire to be a very hands on, conscientious, kind parents. This is a very American perspective so we don’t have the burden of feeling like she’s sucking away at our tax dollars -but at least in my circle there is never any judgement of her not working. She seems like a great mother, and as a woman from a wealthy family business she likely would have taken time off to raise kids had she married someone else.

On the flip side, I think she and William may get a lot more judgement from this generation if they did Charles or even QE style parenting – nannies all the time, dragging them out for publicity, and boarding school ASAP. (Of course W+K have lots of help, but I doubt their nannies are the primary nurterer in their lives the way Charles’ or even Will’s nannies were.) This is the type of parental relationship our generation is working very hard to undo. In short, they still remain “aspirational” to us – bc given the same circumstances, I personally don’t think that I would make choices different from their’s.


Thanks for sending this in! 

Oh, I don’t think there’s a lot of judgement outside of a few fandom pockets. I obviously have very specific ideas as how things should be done, but they are not widely shared. If work ethic were the be-all and end-all of popularity, then Anne would be the most popular royal, and she isn’t, not by a long shot, even among avowed monarchists.

https://yougov.co.uk/news/2018/05/18/who-are-monarchists/

And, given the royals’ various parenting mishaps and what they’ve cost the crown, a good argument could be made that parenting should be Will and Kate’s number one priority. Also, their mental health work gets a lot more press than any number of ribbon-cuttings would get and their two-week-a-month schedule is optimized for maximum publicity. So they are effective at what they do.

I still believe they should get out more, they should embrace smaller patronages, and they should attend more ribbon-cuttings because I think this is the type of royal work that makes a difference in the long run. Being visible, participating in local celebrations, and supporting small events is, imo, just as important (maybe more)  to national cohesion and royal imagery than splashy initiatives like Heads Together. A third of Britons have seen HM in person, compared to 5% for the younger royals. That figure really should go up, imo. One reason HM is so popular is the she has devoted her life to being a visible symbol of the country.

https://yougov.co.uk/news/2018/05/17/almost-third-country-has-seen-or-met-queen-real-li/

But, I suspect, this is not a widely-held opinion. The work they do is effective and well-publicized and they are more popular than most of the other, harder-working royals. So people seem to like what they are doing. I suspect the work ethic issue is not as much of a negative as people think (although I personally do still feel strongly about it). 

This theory will likely be tested in the upcoming months, as I believe KP will make a big “hard-working” pr push on behalf of Megs shortly. I’m very curious to see how that works out.  

Harper’s bazaar ”How Meghan Markle’s First 100 Days as a Royal Compare to Kate Middleton’s”..”The First Event Post-Wedding”,the nude Reiss dress that Kate used to meet the Obama’s at BP was incredibly successful and seeing photos side by side of MM vs Kate,Kate is effortlessly elegant and MM just a mess

anonymoushouseplantfan:

Oh, wow. This is a fantastic slide show.

https://www.harpersbazaar.com/celebrity/latest/g22854790/meghan-markle-kate-middleton-royal-first-100-days/