2_there was some backlash to her Vogue pics by DeMarchelier, how she was now 100% celebrity, mastering the art of (fake) accessibility. Her lowest point was right before her death – remember Dodi was a known coke addict and womanizer, and his dad was persona non grata and a rumored arms dealer. She was playing it up. Nobody thought that would end well.
3_Even back then there was a “what is she doing” attitude about her social life, and how futile her pursuit of true love seemed when you really looked at her temperment, expectations, requirements and circumstances. She’d fall in with the Fayad-types (“Eurotrash” for want of a better word) as she did.
4_also, her antics with Tiggy were well known to the public and very unflattering, particularly as to the position it placed her boys. What elevated her in the end was what she did on AIDs, on mines, and her demeanor engaging the public whilst married to Charles, stuck. Markle’s demeanor with the public is opposite to Diana, try as she might to imitate her. Even if Markle died she’d have no chance at St. Di.
Very good points. Di’s imagine would be very different if she hadn’t died because the criticisms were piling up.
I completely agree with you that post-divorce Diana is her aim, but I do wonder how she’ll get what she wants. If she’s the more guilty party, she’ll be the most unpopular woman in the UK. If Harry’s the more guilty party, no matter what she says he’s done, he’ll get away with being foolish. I don’t think he’ll ever reach the Charles-like “villain” because so many people see him as the boy behind the coffin. We’ve had these people asking Meghan to look after him, like haribo lady.
Would it not be the same in the US? Because if she’s not liked, then the only thing she’ll have is fame/media hounding. So is it just for fame or profitability after the RF? I suppose it doesn’t quite compute in my mind because she might be aiming for Diana, but without that level of popularity wouldn’t it be so easy to fall into post-divorce Fergie?!
I was only about 4 when Diana died, but I know people who have said she only reached this “sainthood” level after she died (I really don’t mean to be offensive, I think it’s quite common for people who die young). So for Meghan to have the Diana life, rather than Fergie, would it just come down to things like photo-ops on the diving board of a yacht?
I think I’m going around in circles here! Sorry about that!
Thanks for sending this in. Diana only reached “People’s Princess” status after her death, but she had a huge post-divorce “princess finally breaks free” pr drive in the US and that’s what Meghan is likely aiming for.
Di sold her old clothes, cut her hair, toned down her makeup, got papped in jeans and gym clothes, ditched her UK charities and began doing more international humanitarian work, etc… She slammed up, got more sexy and wore the “revenge dress.” She started hanging out with celebs more.
The whole thing was spun as finally breaking free from the stifling brf and becoming a superstar on her own. That’s the Di that became popular in the US. That’s the Di Meghan wants to be.
Diana also worked the age difference between her and Charles to her advantage in the press before they were divorced.
I think another anon also mentioned fertility treatments.
Really? If fertility drugs are the cause, then why–as others have noted–does Harry treat her differently? If it were fertility drugs, then wouldn’t he be more understanding since he wants kids. Something doesn’t quite make sense.
Anyway, the side effects for two of the most common drugs for IVF Cetrotide and Lupron can be found here and here.
A mad rush is needed to preserve or catalogue thousands of Arctic archeological sites before they are washed away by warming hastening the thaw of permafrost and coastal erosion, a study said Thursday.
For millennia, the cold has conserved ivory artifacts, driftwood houses and human remains in often near-perfect conditions.
But with faster and more severe climate change in the poles than the rest of the world, the situation has become desperate, with far more sites that will soon be lost than scientists have the time or resources to document.
“An increasing number of ancient sites and structures around the world are now at risk of being lost,” said the study published Thursday in the research journal Antiquity.
“Once destroyed, these resources are gone forever, with irrevocable loss of human heritage and scientific data.” Read more.
Hello dear Plant I’m sorry I don’t know how to send multiple pics, I did a research from Italy (there are some privacy laws that modify the Google search so it might be different from the States) of Vogue Paris and Meghan and you can see every time there is a press release it’s stated on the result. So it was very interesting. A lot of press releases about fashion brands, jewelry, makeup. I’ve researched also Kate on Vogue Paris and I found only one press release about her, that was the article of her and Char coordinating outfits. I will send you other pics next so you can see but you can probably do it better.
Thanks for sending these in! I think many of these are press releases from the brands themselves, but the Diana and “psychological pink” ones are coming from Meghan. They don’t really support any brand. But one reason why we are seeing so much Meghan coverage is that all her brands are sending press releases. In this pic alone we have shoe, beauty and clothing brands e-mailing stuff.
Kate does do press releases, but they are usually about family or work stuff. Also, she usually wears established UK brands that don’t scorch the earth like this.
But it’s interesting to see how it works. Thanks for sending this!
He’s buying insurance. When she turns to bite the hand that feeds her he can show receipts of all the money, aides, and royal events that they gave her.
Thanks! Always good to have an on-the-ground perspective. I do think the “celeb vs. royal” debate has been going on for a while in the UK, though. I’ve seen several articles about it. The Spectator has had a couple and Hilary Mantel did some essays and someone else prominent who I can’t remember right now. I even found an Australian one. This is just another slide down a slippery slope, imo.
My friends, this is a dark hour. Intolerance, cruelty, racism, misogyny, xenophobia, and environmental destruction have been let loose across the land.
Trump controls the Republican Party, the Republican Party controls the House and Senate, and the Senate and Trump will soon control the Supreme Court.
Republicans also control both chambers in 32 states (33 if you count Nebraska) and 33 governorships. And in many of these states they are entrenching their power by gerrymandering and arranging to suppress votes.
Yet only 27 percent of Americans are Republican, and the vast majority of Americans disapprove of Trump. The GOP itself is now little more than Trump, Fox News, a handful of billionaire funders, and evangelicals who oppose a woman’s right to choose, gay marriage, and the Constitution’s separation of church and state.
So what are we – the majority – to do?
First and most importantly, do not give up. That’s what they want us to do. Then they’d have no opposition at all.
Second, in the short term, if you are represented by a Republican senator, do whatever you can to get him or her to reject Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, or, at the least, postpone consideration until after the midterm elections. Urge others to join with you. Senate switchboard: 202-224-3121
Fourth, don’t succumb to divisive incrimination over “who lost” the 2016 election (Hillary loyalists, Bernie supporters, Jill Stein voters, etc.). This will get us nowhere. We must be united.
Fifth, vote this November 6 for people who will stand up to the Trump Republican outrage. Mobilize and organize others to do so. Contact friends and relations in “red” states, and urge them to do the same.
Sixth, help lay the groundwork for the 2020 presidential election, so that even if Trump survives Mueller and impeachment he will not be reelected.
Finally, know that this fight will be long and hard. It will require our patience, our courage, and our resolve. The stakes could not be higher.
I have no clue how they are going to manage the christening, the RAF anniversary and the Irish tour, all in the span of three days. I’m hoping for a real fuck-up this time.
And we’ll probably get a real fuck-up at that time.
Harry has a new beaded bracelet, guys! Oh, and his trip included Botswana. We all know what happens in Botswana, don’t we? This is another possible explanation for Meghan’s Xanax look.
We reported a few weeks ago that some of the more old school members of the Royal household didn’t know what to make of the new Duchess of Sussex, so invented the nickname “Meghan The Menace”.
Their eyebrows have been raised further with Ms Markle’s choice of personal aide. Not a tried and trusted Royal adviser or an experienced aristo to help her navigate the choppy waters of royal etiquette, but someone from the celebrity world, whose biggest previous job was working for Madonna.
Buckingham Palace staff are already dining out on a tale of how Meghan’s new girl was calling up big brands and asking for freebies, as if her boss was in the cast of Love Island rather than married to the Queen’s grandson.
From this week’s Popitch
Whoa! Thank you so much for sending this in.
Here’s the “few weeks ago” item, in case anyone is interested:
House of Brat 