royal-confessions:

“When I saw Queen Margrethe break drown at Henrik’s funeral, my heart broke into pieces for her. I know that he had his faults (we all do), but he will be remembered by his family as a loving husband, father, and grandfather. It just reminded me that we do get to celebrate the highs in life (weddings, births) with the royals, but we also see the lows. This is a great reminder that behind the royal facade is a FAMILY.” – Submitted by Anonymous

sespursongles:

I found out recently that at a time of his life when Tolstoy was in a slump and had stopped writing & earning money, his wife Sophia borrowed money from her mum to start her own publishing office and publish editions of his works—and in order to figure out how publishing worked, she travelled to St Petersburg to ask Anna Dostoyevsky for advice, as Anna had also spent the past 14 years planning the editions of her husband’s work, correcting proofs, placing ads in papers, battling official censors, etc.
It reminded me of this post about women writers supporting each other—so many links between women in history that we never hear about. Someone please write a book about the wives of all the great male writers…

(In previous years Sophia, while giving birth to Tolstoy’s 13 children and raising them and managing his estate (he was a count) pretty much on her own, also wrote the clean copies of all of his manuscripts out of his nearly illegible drafts—the final draft of War and Peace was 3,000 pages and she copied it seven times, correcting spelling and grammar and offering key suggestions and critiques of the plot; for example explaining to him that people would be more interested in the social or romantic plots, the human aspects, than in the minutiae of the battles and war strategy plots. A few months before his death, Tolstoy named a male friend the executor of his literary estate rather than his wife, who had been doing this thankless job since she was 19, and gave to the public domain all the copyrights to his works that Sophia had previously owned (for her publishing company). She wrote in her diary “Now I am cast aside as of no further use, although I am, nevertheless, expected to do impossible things.”)

Also I shouldn’t be surprised (but I am) at just how many “great male writers” read their wife’s (or female relatives’) diaries and drew a lot of inspiration from them, stealing ideas or even sometimes entire sentences / paragraphs / poems out of them. This is such a recurrent pattern. There’s Tolstoy (who read Sophia’s diaries and also asked her, when she was 17, to show him a short story she’d written, gave it back to her the next day saying he’d barely glanced at it, when he actually wrote in his diary “What force of truth and simplicity!” and used the story as the embryo for the Rostov family in War and Peace), but also William Wordsworth who read his sister Dorothy’s journal and drew a lot from it, and F. Scott Fitzgerald of course. When Zelda was still young a magazine editor offered to publish parts of her journals, and her husband (of 5 months!) said he couldn’t allow it because he drew a lot of inspiration from them and planned on using parts of them in his future novels and short stories. There’s also French novelist Raymond Radiguet who stole his female lover’s diary to write his novel The Devil in the Flesh, and was lauded by fellow male writers & critics for his brilliant insights into a woman’s mind. Which had been copy/pasted from this woman’s diary.
[Also, while he didn’t read it until after her death, Henry James’s sister Alice mentions in her diary that he “embedded in his pages many pearls fallen from my lips, which he steals in the most unblushing way, saying, simply, that he knew they had been said by the family, so it did not matter.”]
I really love reading women’s journals, and when they were married to a famous writer, you wouldn’t believe how often the person who edited them mentions in the introduction “if some passages sound familiar it’s because her husband was reading her diary and ~getting inspired” ie plagiarising although the term technically doesn’t apply because every word his wife wrote and idea she had was legally his property (just like she was).

It makes me feel so bitter to contrast what women do—decades of unpaid, unacknowledged work to proofread, copy, publish, preserve from censorship, improve, develop and promote their husband’s writing—with what men do—openly steal ideas and whole sentences from their wife’s writing while forcing her to give birth to 13 children that she didn’t want and he doesn’t help raise.

Some of the press is saying she looked awful yet according to the DM she stole the show

anonymoushouseplantfan:

I think they are just stirring the pot. The best rated comment has 10k likes now.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-5853123/Prince-Harry-Meghan-Markle-steal-Princess-Dianas-nieces-wedding.html#comments

She’s wearing a bedsheet with a wad of toilet paper on her head.

I don’t understand how she thought she looks good when she left Nott Cott.

Lainey ”If the goddman not-really-that-off-the-shoulder pink dress really would have been a problem with Her Majesty,Samantha would have stepped in’…Samantha will be blame too,when/if MM messed up on the engagement with the Queen

anonymoushouseplantfan:

LOLOL, they are furious about the inappropriate comments. Dude, anyone can tell that the dress was wrong. We haven’t seen off-the-sholder at Trooping EVER, but suddenly it turns out that it was okay all along? Pffft.

And now Sam Cohen is okaying her clothes? In what universe? It’s been clear form the very beginning (starting with the photocall facial drama) that these two do whatever they want and no one says boo to them. The clothes are being picked in Soho House with Jess. Sam gets to see it when Meghan shows up in it. She’s not vetting anything.

Hell, even Givenchy is going “we had eight fittings and this is what she wanted because she’s a strong personality and she knows what she wants.” They couldn’t get a waist tucked in and their fashion reputation was on the line. Do you really think Sam gets to veto necklines? Sam is lucky she got a backup job after quitting BP in a huff. She’s not saying shit.

Vanity Fair: Winfrey said she would like to be Harry and Meghan’s first interview as a married couple: – this is a DONE DEAL ya’ll. Harry, oh Harry, what have you done? This interview will be a repeat of the engagement, with all the hand squeezing and all the lies. I suspect there is a tug-of-war in the palace about this. And I think Megs & Harry will win. Oh my. Just when we thought Harry couldn’t get any dumber…

anonymoushouseplantfan:

https://www.vanityfair.com/style/2018/06/oprah-winfrey-doria-ragland-basket-of-kumquats-meghan-markle-royal-wedding

I can see these two famewhores doing this after Ascot. It wouldn’t surprise me if they did. They wouldn’t want to wait a year or two for an interview with someone so well known. They’d want to do it as soon as possible so that they can maintain their hype and press interest. The thing is, once they do something like this, then it’s game on for the rest of the UK press to do what they do best.

Meghan is trying to pull off sexy rebel – doing things right on the surface but with what she imagines are small adjustments that pull focus to her. The kind of focus that is “She’s so inappropriate!” but to her = sexy. Problem is she just looks tacky and weird, not sexy. We can see her sexing things up, but she’s not achieving actual sexy.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

I can see this, but you don’t want to bring “sexy” into the royal sphere. It just looks tacky.

Also, Lainey is at it again course-correcting for Rachel. Have you noticed her constantly using the prefix “Royal” now anytime she mentions Rachel? I don’t see her doing that with any of the other actual Royals. I wonder though, how do Lainey and her Toronto based peers seriously address Rachel as HRH. I mean, this chic is basic AF for the rest of us.. imagine knowing her from back in the day? How do you reconcile that? 1/2

anonymoushouseplantfan:

2/2 – Do you listen to Lainey’s podcasts? Her co-podcast producer mentioned that they used to do a lot of fashion/entertainment/regional hotspot segments with local based celebrities. Apparently there is a LOT of b-roll sitting around Toronto with Rachel fake-lifestyle guruing. The producer mentioned she though Rachel was basic AF, and it was jarring to have one of their own (or someone even lower than them on the thirsty-social TO totem pole) in the BRF.


Thanks, I don’t listen to the podcast, so this is interesting.

Yup. It was on the “Sasha Answers” podcast after the wedding:

They discuss Megs and the wedding for the first 17 and a half minutes. Sasha openly says that Megs did NOT come across as completely genuine during the wedding. 

They also discuss Meg’s fashion disaster from her first outing as a royal.

I think Lainey actually even says during the podcast that she’s not sure she’s ever liked Meghan’s style. 

You know, things Lainey will say talking on a podcast that she won’t put in writing for her readers…

robgronkwowski:

Princess Charlotte took a small fall on the balcony during Trooping the Color. The little princess was immediately comforted by her mummy and Savannah Phillips. Meanwhile, Prince George couldn’t help but wonder and look over to see what was going on with his little sister.

Someone is ready for a nap!

Sign the Free Press Action open letter to support net neutrality

theancientworld:

“Despite our huge victory in the Senate, Trump’s FCC says that Net Neutrality will end on June 11. 

So we’re turning up the heat: We’ve written an open letter telling every single member of the U.S. House that Net Neutrality is the will of the people — and it’s time for them to join us on the right side of history.

Add your name to the open letter calling on the House of Representatives to stand with #TeamInternet in support of the Net Neutrality Congressional Review Act resolution.

We’ll personally deliver this letter with your signature to the U.S. House to let lawmakers know that time is running out. No more fake support, playing footsie with cable lobbyists or trying to fool us with weak legislation.

You’re either supporting the CRA to restore strong Net Neutrality rules, or siding with Team Cable — and the ISPs’ plans to pick and choose which voices get heard online.

Net Neutrality is a racial-justice issue. It’s a gender-equity issue. It’s a free-speech issue, and it’s one of the most important discussions of our time.

Add your signature to the open letter to remind your congressmember that they represent you and your neighbors — not companies like Comcast. We’ll make sure they receive it.”

– Free Press Action

Sign the Free Press Action open letter to support net neutrality

I’m going to disagree with the theory that M is going to get bored. First. I think PH will. Why? When PH/M met, M was a more “exciting” person. She was a working actress who had a “sexy” past (concept of relativity). She had Team Suits to help her dress and she had her own “team” (personal and pr) to help creative a character. The person PH fell for is disappearing before his eyes. What she’s turning into is an old, poorly “presented”, widely ridiculed, VERY BORING version of Kate.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

That is quite possible.

Why are folks bothered about her outing with the queen? Who cares. I think she mucked up badly at that garden party and the queen is showing her how it’s done. I predict she will look crazy, act crazy and hm will be one and done. Thing about the skank is she can’t keep it up for long, hence her lack of longest it’s with folks. She can’t do it. Harry sold her as you always say but there is no there there.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

That’s my take on it too. I think people are still surprised at the amount of hand-holding she is getting. I figured that was the case when they spent tons of money doing the nothing burger Foundation Forum so she could show up in a navy bathrobe and quote some Twitter hashtags.

But, yes, the schedule is exactly like the Cardiff and Edinburgh visits that she fumbled. They’re showing her how it’s done.

If HM is working harder than ever, then why is she giving MM 3 events with her in one day? Is this another hand holding thing? No way the Queen sees her as an asset.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

I’d say hand-holding, but it’s going to be spun as “an asset.”

The original expectation was that Meghan was going to effortlessly “nail” all of this and the spin during the “regional tour” was that she was forging ahead with her own “messy bun and black pants” version of royal style and this was The Best Thing EVER. 

But her after-regional tour persona has been a complete RepliKate makeover with senior royals stepping in to show her how it’s done. I know the media is spinning this as “right hand woman” or whatever, but Kate was flipping pancakes during her engagement and doing solo charity galas after her wedding. She was completely independent.

So far, Meghan has (i) laughed at a Commonwealth Service performer, (ii) gone to a memorial service sleeveless, (iii) worn ROI colors in NI, (iv) shown up with messy hair and clothes, (v) shown up at her wedding stoned, (vi) sexily shashayed up and down, (vii) grabbed the other royals…etc…  Not to mention the $75k engagement dress, the engagement interview snafus, and the mishandling of the family drama at the wedding.

I know we’re going to get a ton of “Meghan supporting HM” press, but I see this more as hand-holding and damage control. The royals don’t “bond” during engagements. They work. You don’t bring your grandson’s clueless bride to a work event so you can get to know her better. You bring her to show her how it’s done.

Speaking as a Swede (tjoho!) I’d say that CP and Sofia dating several years, wearthering out the ridicule of her past etc played a part. But mostly, it was that Sofia never attempted, for us anyway, to be someone she’s not. She didn’t pretend she never did BigBrother etc. and was a saint and would save the world, or played a pity card. She was just herself – whatever you might think of that. And it’s disarming, owning who you are. There’s really not much to level at someone like that.

anonymoushouseplantfan:

That’s a good point.